It fixed the problem :-)
Thanks.
I did notice the extra time it takes to close the program. This solution
is better, but the whole thing sort of sucks.
In the Sun bug report:
"...we'll leave this
bug open in the hope that it will attract attention from someone more clever
than we are"
Johan,
What we are looking for is if Neo can detect the issue and log it.
In Spring's hibernate template classes this read-only flag is used to
optimize things (no flush to db). But for hibernate it also causes and
an exception if any write operations are performed (see
http://forum.springframework.org/
On 11/7/07, Klas Ehnrot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/7/07, Emil Eifrem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 11/6/07, Klas Ehnrot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > 2. Showing nestled transactions, emphasizing to not assume that the
> > > caller of a method has setup a transaction?
> >
> > Yu
#3: Improve NeoShell
-+--
Reporter: emil |Owner: mattias
Type: enhancement request | Status: assigned
Priority: major|Milestone: neo-1.0
Component: neo-core imp
#20: Minor API improvements
-+--
Reporter: emil | Owner: johans
Type: enhancement request | Status: new
Priority: major| Milestone: neo-1.0
Component: neo-core im
#20: Minor API improvements
-+--
Reporter: emil |Owner: emil
Type: enhancement request | Status: assigned
Priority: major|Milestone: neo-1.0
Component: neo-c
#20: Minor API improvements
-+--
Reporter: emil |Owner: emil
Type: enhancement request | Status: assigned
Priority: major|Milestone: neo-1.0
Component: neo-c
On Nov 8, 2007 5:01 PM, Johan Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/7/07, Klas Ehnrot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 11/7/07, Emil Eifrem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 11/6/07, Klas Ehnrot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 2. Showing nestled transactions, emphasizing to not
> > Two nodes will be added, this might be counter intuitive if you don't
> > know that we do not support real nested transactions (this needs to be
> > made more clear in the documentation). The semantics of our
> > transactions is as follows:
> >
> > o a nested transaction will not start a new tr
On Nov 9, 2007 12:11 AM, Johan Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Two nodes will be added, this might be counter intuitive if you don't
> > > know that we do not support real nested transactions (this needs to be
> > > made more clear in the documentation). The semantics of our
> > > transac
10 matches
Mail list logo