Hi Michael,
thanks for that suggestion, it may well address my concerns. I didn't want
to loose the direct graph relationships since that's an integral part of my
data model and application. But, as you say, there's nothing to stop adding
supporting relationships that aren't navigated when I need
You don't have to loose the direct relationship neccessarily. You can just add
a second
relationship between the nodes. Just when you need to access the evidence
information
you need to take the longer route.
Michael
Jonny Wray schrieb:
> Emil,
>
> thanks for the reply. Yes, I think you've und
Emil,
thanks for the reply. Yes, I think you've understood the problem. My
'evidence' is complex enough that the direct, intuitive solution you mention
wasn't sitting well with me, basically due to the brittleness you mention.
The moment you starting having .1 and .2 added to strings to indicate
d
3 matches
Mail list logo
