Re: [Neo] Concurrent transactions

2009-11-18 Thread Johan Svensson
Hi, I added a comment on the ticket. The problem is (as pointed out in the comment) the join performed from thread 1 (main) on thread 2. If that is removed both transactions will complete (no deadlock). Regards, -Johan On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Daniel Martínez wrote: > Ok, I created a ti

Re: [Neo] Lucene version

2009-11-18 Thread Mattias Persson
Thanks, there seems to be some known problems with lucene on NFS. If you're calling getNodes on a non-existing index then I committed a fix for that (added one extra null check), but if that index should exist it could just be that lucene is having trouble with NFS. I'll look into this further to

Re: [Neo] sort/filter operations

2009-11-18 Thread Craig Taverner
I had an answer for this also, but see that Andreas and Anders have both answered with the two mechanisms I had tried: - lucene - custom index But I thought I'd add a little on the custom index idea, because I think that can also provide fast sorting, if you are usually requiring answers in

Re: [Neo] Lucene version

2009-11-18 Thread Jakub Kotowski
Mattias Persson schrieb: >>> After playing with it more, the culprit seems to be not the symbolic >>> link but the local drive :-/ When I delete the neo4j directory with the >>> db and start the application from the local drive then I'm getting the >>> NPEs - even if I shut the server down and star

Re: [Neo] Lucene version

2009-11-18 Thread Mattias Persson
>> After playing with it more, the culprit seems to be not the symbolic >> link but the local drive :-/ When I delete the neo4j directory with the >> db and start the application from the local drive then I'm getting the >> NPEs - even if I shut the server down and start it again. When I delete >>