Re: [Neo] Maven Dependency For Neo Util for Lucene BatchInserter?

2009-12-04 Thread Todd Stavish
Thanks Mattias. Just an FYI, there doesn't seem to be 1.0-b10 version build for neo-utils yet. http://m2.neo4j.org/org/neo4j/neo-utils/ Regards, Todd On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Mattias Persson wrote: > 2009/12/4 Todd Stavish : >> I am using the Lucene Batch Inserter with attributes

Re: [Neo] Maven Dependency For Neo Util for Lucene BatchInserter?

2009-12-04 Thread Mattias Persson
2009/12/4 Todd Stavish : > I am using the Lucene Batch Inserter with attributes that have a space > (combined first name and last name). > > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: > org.neo4j.impl.util.FileUtils.fixSeparatorsInPath(Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/String; >        at

[Neo] Maven Dependency For Neo Util for Lucene BatchInserter?

2009-12-04 Thread Todd Stavish
I am using the Lucene Batch Inserter with attributes that have a space (combined first name and last name). Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.neo4j.impl.util.FileUtils.fixSeparatorsInPath(Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/String; at org.neo4j.util.index.LuceneIndexBa

Re: [Neo] LuceneIndexBatchInserter doubt

2009-12-04 Thread Núria Trench
Hi Mattias, Thank you very much for fixing the problem so fast. I will try it as soon as the new changes will be available in the maven repository. Núria. 2009/12/4 Mattias Persson > I fixed the problem and also added a cache per key for faster > getNodes/getSingleNode lookup during the insert

Re: [Neo] LuceneIndexBatchInserter doubt

2009-12-04 Thread Mattias Persson
I fixed the problem and also added a cache per key for faster getNodes/getSingleNode lookup during the insert process. However the cache assumes that there's nothing in the index when the process starts (which almost always will be true) to speed things up even further. You can control the cache s

Re: [Neo] LuceneIndexBatchInserter doubt

2009-12-04 Thread Mattias Persson
I think I found the problem... it's indexing as it should, but it isn't reflected in getNodes/getSingleNode properly until you flush/optimize/shutdown the index. I'll try to fix it today! 2009/12/3 Núria Trench : > Thank you very much for your response. > If you need more information, you only hav