The best way in most cases is to actually traverse the graph via
Node#getRelationships or Node#traverse... Tried it?
2010/2/1 Anton Popov :
> Hello Rick,
>
> I've tried to set my own ID to be able to quickly find my relations, because
> of unavailable relation indexing functionality. As far as I c
Adding some links to Peters answer:
http://wiki.neo4j.org/content/Online_Backup
http://components.neo4j.org/neo4j-online-backup/apidocs/index.html
If you're using maven:
groupId: org.neo4j
artifactId: neo4j-online-backup
version: 0.4-SNAPSHOT (is the latest)
2010/2/1 Peter Neubauer :
> Philip,
>
Hello Rick,
I've tried to set my own ID to be able to quickly find my relations, because
of unavailable relation indexing functionality. As far as I can see I will
make changes to LuceneIndex.
On 29 January 2010 17:48, Rick Bullotta <
rick.bullo...@burningskysoftware.com> wrote:
> Why do you nee
Ah... Understood, thank you.
But why method createNode, which set the node id implicitly, is public?
I've tried to find Relationship indexing to be able to change graph
dynamically.
On 29 January 2010 16:49, Mattias Persson wrote:
> 2010/1/29 Anton Popov :
> > And as far as I can see there is n
Philip,
automatic synching of Neo4j is not at the moment one of the
out-of-the-box features. Probably the easiest way is to define some
form of messaging format, like JSON, XMPP or binary, and send things
forth and back as you like. For your application, that might mean you
need a messaging bus to
5 matches
Mail list logo
