Hi Sumanth!
Even if we traverse using BREADTH_FIRST, node3 and node7 are covered at
level 1, so they won't be considered in the second level. Effectively I just
get node8(node5 has a different name), where I wanted to have node3 and
node7 as well.
That's correct: when using a traverser, only
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Satish Varma Dandu dsva...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi John/nishith/Ulf,
Thanks guys for all your replies.
John,
I was thinking about the same thing that you suggested. I havent yet
constructed a huge n/w, but i was just curious how long will it take to
traverse
I will explain me better.
Every node has:
- One String that have 5 chars.
- One String that have 3 chars.
- One String that have 4 chars.
- One String that have 100 chars.
Mike
El vie, 26-02-2010 a las 10:05 +0100, Miguel Ángel Águila Lorente
escribió:
I don't know if I'm answering your
Yes, one of them is node type, but I need because I also use this
property for indexing depend on the kind of node.
El vie, 26-02-2010 a las 13:11 +0100, Mattias Persson escribió:
2010/2/26 Miguel Ángel Águila magu...@ac.upc.edu:
I will explain me better.
Every node has:
- One String
If it would be possible to have the node type as an integer it'd be
more space efficient. Also if you just need the node type for
lookups you don't need to set such property on the node, it could be
enough to just index it.
With those data you provided your string property store should be 28G,
That makes sense, I'll give it a try, thanks!
2010/2/26 Mattias Persson matt...@neotechnology.com:
2010/2/26 Raul Raja Martinez raulr...@gmail.com:
Hi Mattias,
Thanks for the docs.
I'm trying to solve this issue now and here is the problem I'm facing...
Where it says in the wiki:
Rewrite
I am using neo4j-kernel
version1.1-SNAPSHOT/version
the full stack trace:
java.lang.RuntimeException:
org.neo4j.kernel.impl.transaction.TransactionFailureException: Unable to
write command to logical log.
at
Ok, thank you.
I've been thinking and I can change the String of node type for an integer.
I'll change it and some other things and will try to execute another time,
when the trials finishes I will comment you how have it gone.
Mike
2010/2/26 Mattias Persson matt...@neotechnology.com
If it
We setup an fs based graph on the jvm java.io.tmp folder and destroy
on every setup() teardown() if necessary.
This is how all of our unit tests run and it works fine.
An in memory store may give you a false view on how things work if one
of the things you are testing is performance, specially in
Interesting point, but i prefer measuring the performance on a system
level rather than down in my unit tests, and to write very quick unit
tests when I can.
In this case it was more interested in getting rid of the need to do
anyting in my tearDown and/or setUp methods. I usually prefer to get
Hi,
I got this solved by following your suggestion and most important
decreasing the corePoolSize in the Thread pool.
Obviously the bigger the number of threads that are trying to run in
parallel the more likely to deadlocks.
What's most intriguing is that this same code without changes ran fine
11 matches
Mail list logo
