[Neo4j] Database performance difference between batch inserter and normal insert

2010-06-30 Thread Suruchi Deodhar
Hello! I had a few questions regarding Batch insert and normal insert in neo4j: - All the properties of nodes need to be set initially while creating graph db in batch insert mode.Can the values of a subset of the nodes be updated/changed later on? Does this lead to any performance issues? - Whi

[Neo4j] Neo4j Blog: Neo4j development news

2010-06-30 Thread Anders Nawroth
Hi! I've written about part of the recent Neo4j development taking place: http://blog.neo4j.org/2010/06/neo4j-development-news.html There's lots of links to this mailing list in it :-) /anders ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.n

[Neo4j] neo4j REST server standalone

2010-06-30 Thread Mohit Vazirani
Hi, I'm a beginner to neo4j. Recently set up the standalone rest server in linux (started using neo4j-rest start). I was reviewing http://wiki.neo4j.org/content/Configuration_Settings and was wondering how to specify memory-mapped I/O settings & other backup-related settings to the REST server

Re: [Neo4j] Database performance difference between batch inserter and normal insert

2010-06-30 Thread Tobias Ivarsson
Hi Suruchi, I'll answer each question inline below. On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Suruchi Deodhar wrote: > Hello! > > I had a few questions regarding Batch insert and normal insert in neo4j: > > - All the properties of nodes need to be set initially while creating graph > db in batch insert m

[Neo4j] Database performance difference between batch inserter and normal insert

2010-06-30 Thread Suruchi Deodhar
Hello! I had a few questions regarding Batch insert and normal insert in neo4j: - All the properties of nodes need to be set initially while creating graph db in batch insert mode.Can the values of a subset of the nodes be updated/changed later on? Does this lead to any performance issues? - Whi

Re: [Neo4j] Problem with Neo4j 1.1 Traversal API

2010-06-30 Thread Tobias Ivarsson
This problem has a simple solution: Remove neo4j-commons-1.0 from your classpath, it conflicts with the commons classes in 1.1-SNAPSHOT (that have now moved into kernel). Cheers, Tobias On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Christian Morgner < christian.morg...@udo.edu> wrote: > Hi all, > > I encou

Re: [Neo4j] LuceneFulltextIndexService searching example

2010-06-30 Thread Mattias Persson
As the example states you must use the LuceneFulltextQueryIndexService (not the LuceneFulltextIndexService)! 2010/6/30 Paddy > I have been trying out the example at: > http://wiki.neo4j.org/content/Indexing_with_IndexService > I'm trying to implement LuceneFulltextIndexService searching > > I ma

[Neo4j] Problem with Neo4j 1.1 Traversal API

2010-06-30 Thread Christian Morgner
Hi all, I encountered a problem with the new TraversalDescription API in 1.1-SNAPSHOT (1.1-20100628.145423-131), using neo4j-commons-1.0. The code TraversalDescription descr = TraversalFactory.createTraversalDescription() .breadthFirst() .expand(TraversalFactory.expanderForType(RelTypes

Re: [Neo4j] Index Performance(Was: Event framework has landed)

2010-06-30 Thread Mattias Persson
Since write operations are confined in a transaction, data is only written in tx.finish() så that's where neo4j does the invalidation of the searcher. I.e. assuming multiple write operations are performed in each transaction searchers need not be invalidated as often, and only when something is act

Re: [Neo4j] Index Performance(Was: Event framework has landed)

2010-06-30 Thread Atle Prange
Yes, but isn't that what you in practice have to do when using lucene as an index for values in neo4j? Data could be written all the time, and then you have to open a new reader every time you do a search, at least when the index for the value you are searching for has changed. How is that impleme