Re: [Neo4j] Accessing node relationships via the Python REST client

2010-12-28 Thread Javier de la Rosa
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 17:05, Peter Neubauer wrote: > is there anything we need to change in the Neo4j > REST API before 1.2 in order to be done here? I'm not sure, but I think the new plugins feature exposes URL's with hyphens instead of underscores. > It seems the only thing > required here a

Re: [Neo4j] Accessing node relationships via the Python REST client

2010-12-28 Thread Peter Neubauer
All, is this ok now, and is there anything we need to change in the Neo4j REST API before 1.2 in order to be done here? It seems the only thing required here are changes on the Python side? Cheers, /peter neubauer GTalk:      neubauer.peter Skype       peter.neubauer Phone       +46 704 106975 L

Re: [Neo4j] Run neo4j on IBM websphere 6 (JDK 1.5)

2010-12-28 Thread Tobias Ivarsson
After a second look it turns out that what you have reported is in fact not a problem. It is handled properly, we print a warning to let the user know that there we couldn't find the JMX connection URL to this JVM, but it's not severe. I've lowered the log level from INFO to CONFIG in rev 8111. Neo

Re: [Neo4j] InvalidRecordException exception

2010-12-28 Thread Johan Svensson
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:34 PM, George Ciubotaru wrote: > > Taking a second look over that locking mechanism, I've noticed that it uses > read locks for a delete operation. Should there be write locks instead? > Yes, sorry about that it should be write locks. The read locks will still allow fo

Re: [Neo4j] Run neo4j on IBM websphere 6 (JDK 1.5)

2010-12-28 Thread Tobias Ivarsson
Hi Ron, The 1.5 requirement is for Neo4j kernel, the core of embedded Neo4j. Neo4j HA actually requires JDK 6, and has not been tested on other JDKs than Sun/OpenJDK. The Exception you are reporting is in fact from the use of a Sun specific class, it is going to be resolved when we get around to m