Hi Claudio,
> Marko has been running the benchmark for some time ago, I do not know
> the exact details, but maybe he has the code laying around somewhere?
As we talked before, all the code is in GraphDB-Bench
(http://graphdb-bench.tinkerpop.com).
Take care,
Marko.
I downloaded Neo4j 1.2 release for linux from
http://neo4j.org/get?file=neo4j-1.2-unix.tar.gz and extracted it to a directory
using tar -zxvf . I installed the service using bin/neo4j install option.
Next, I followed documentation at
http://wiki.neo4j.org/content/Getting_Started_With_Neo4j_Serv
Hi Peter
Yes, the road_map_ed me:)
BTW, about proxy and cache spi, any thoughts?
And, I wonder the consideration about the neo disk files? the BIG file
is ever brainstormed? Could you please tell me some ?
致敬
向雅
2011/1/22 Peter Neubauer :
> Hi there,
> at least for the node space size, suppo
Hi there,
at least for the node space size, support for a bigger ID address
space is planned for Neo4j 1.3, so that is coming :)
Cheers,
/peter neubauer
GTalk: neubauer.peter
Skype peter.neubauer
Phone +46 704 106975
LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer
Twitter ht
Yes, Sure!
My current experience is :
1, UML associate object maybe model as Relationship. Though, when
model thing as the associate object, it's a problem.
2, Node space is limited, especially, when the biz objects versioned.
3, Graph no relationship between edges, in some case, maybe promoting
t
Is there any advantage/difference of using one or the other?
___
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
Claudio,
Marko has been running the benchmark for some time ago, I do not know
the exact details, but maybe he has the code laying around somewhere?
Cheers,
/peter neubauer
GTalk: neubauer.peter
Skype peter.neubauer
Phone +46 704 106975
LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neub
Thanks Mattias. I have experimented with the *rdf-sail *package. Does this
mean that developers should be using the openRDF Sesame implementation with
a Neo4j RdfStore instead of the MetaModel? I'm trying to understand the
Neo4j roadmap in regards to RDF.
Regards,
Adnan
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at
You could always connect your islands to the reference node or similar, so
that your graph becomes all connected and cosy.
2011/1/21 Andreas Bauer
> Hi,
>
> ok, I thought the "islands" are shown as well. Maybe I did something wrong?
>
> In my case, I don't know the connections in advance. Some m
Hi,
ok, I thought the "islands" are shown as well. Maybe I did something wrong?
In my case, I don't know the connections in advance. Some may connect after
time and some stay isolated. Is there a better or right way to do this?
Cheers,
Andi
Am 21.01.2011 um 13:56 schrieb Mattias Persson :
>
Hi!
Neoclipse uses a traversal first, and then also looks for any additional
relationships between the nodes found in the traversal. It doesn't pick
up islands of nodes, there's always a single start node for the traversal.
/anders
2011-01-21 13:56, Mattias Persson skrev:
> If those three node
Hi,
Will there be any facility in the future to incorporate node and edge
cluster; hyper edges and nodes into your design ?
I am currently unaware if neo4j supports this.
Akhil
___
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman
Hi, all.
Since it has been a frequent topic of conversation recently, I'd like to get
a roadmap dialog started on the topic of a companion blob/document store for
Neo. While there are plenty of ways to "roll our own", it requires a lot of
extra effort when we get into HA and load balanced scenari
2011/1/19 Adnan Duric :
> Hi list,
>
> I'm currently writing a quickstart wiki on building an RDF store an
querying
> using SPARQL.
>
> When instantiating a* org.neo4j.rdf.sparql.Neo4jSparqlEngine*, the
required
> parameters are: *Neo4jSparqlEngine( RepresentationStrategy
> representationStrategy,
If those three nodes have no other relationships then Neoclipse won't
show other stuff, correct. I think it can only traverse and display
nodes that are connected, not individual islands of nodes. Or am I
wrong here (asking the list)?
2011/1/21 Andreas Bauer :
> Hi,
>
> I know. By code no problem,
Joshi,
yes, do report back on how things go!
Cheers,
/peter neubauer
GTalk: neubauer.peter
Skype peter.neubauer
Phone +46 704 106975
LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer
Twitter http://twitter.com/peterneubauer
http://www.neo4j.org - Your high perfo
Oh,
btw, the roadmap document is at http://wiki.neo4j.org/content/Roadmap
Cheers,
/peter neubauer
GTalk: neubauer.peter
Skype peter.neubauer
Phone +46 704 106975
LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer
Twitter http://twitter.com/peterneubauer
http://www.neo4j.org
Hi all,
the roadmap document is now updated for 1.3.M1. We are struggling to
get a better setup between trac.neo4j.org, the Neo Technology user
stories and other issue tracking needs, so that the whole process is
more transparent and open for more participation. Please bear with us
while figuring o
Yes,
good move. Also, if Gremlin 0.7 can be released during the weekend, we
might have a chance to get it into the next milestone of Neo4j,
1.3.M1!
Cheers,
/peter neubauer
GTalk: neubauer.peter
Skype peter.neubauer
Phone +46 704 106975
LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neuba
Really impressive. The move to groovy made this so much more concise.
Thanks Marko
Am 21.01.2011 um 02:50 schrieb Marko Rodriguez:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I thought many of you might be interested in seeing Gremlin in action
> (http://gremlin.tinkerpop.com). Gremlin 0.7 has many great features that
20 matches
Mail list logo
