http://docs.neo4j.org/chunked/1.4-SNAPSHOT/rest-api-traverse.html
Sent from my phone.
On Jun 22, 2011 8:17 AM, "Josh Adell" wrote:
> I've been googling and searching all over the nei4j site and wiki for
> examples of doing traversal through the REST API. I know I'll be
> writing my traversal func
I've been googling and searching all over the nei4j site and wiki for
examples of doing traversal through the REST API. I know I'll be
writing my traversal functions in Javascript. Are there docs on the
APIs of the objects I'll have access to in my prune evaluator and
return functions?
Thanks,
J
I'd guess not. Feel free to try upgrading the lucene version and see what
happens. I dug around and I think these commits will fix the source code
incompatibilities when moving from lucene 3.0.1 to 3.1.0:
https://github.com/neo4j/community/commit/931bdb49d2017e11440bf588bc170a68f09a83b2
https://gi
Hi Manav,
Embedding Neo4j in a Scala/Lift application is a perfectly sensible thing to
do. The biggest trade-off is missing the web-based administration for the
database. Are you thinking about using the Lift as the user application, or
just as an alternative for exposing domain-specific interf
I'm afraid it's too late to switch to a new version of lucene now for 1.4,
but I can see it entering early 1.5 if there's no show stopper.
Compilation-and-unit-tests-wise Lucene 3.2 seems to just work when replacing
it with 3.1 in 1.4-SNAPSHOT, that's all I know about it at this stage. I
also don't
The above exception is thrown from the call stack indicated below while
traversing a neo4j graph using the EmbedesReadOnly database. Using 1.4M04.
The application is running with 1gb of heap with defaulting all other
parameters except cache_type=weak on windows.
I found some reports of this ex
Hi Folks,
we are looking forward to make an OWL ontology database as a mirror of
a relational database for an upcoming social network semantic website
is it a good decision to make?
actually we can go for three options:
1 complete owl\graph database, no relational db
2 owl mirror of relati
2011/6/20 Jim Webber
> Hi Massimo,
>
> Yes, those IDs can be recycled. In theory you don't know when they'll be
> recycled either (in practice they may be stable between reboots in the
> current stack, but who knows what future behaviour will be).
>
> And hence it's a bad practice to store node/r
Hi
Sorry for the late reply.
I have done some experiment trying to run neo4j.rb on MRI a while a ago,
check this old branch:
https://github.com/andreasronge/neo4j/tree/rjb
It might be possible to run neo4j.rb on MRI but some parts of the code has
to be rewritten specifically for RJB. I would be r
9 matches
Mail list logo
