Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j server plugin

2011-11-19 Thread Shireesh
Thank you for your quick reply. will follow the steps and post back if i find any diificulty. Thankz Again. Shireesh. -- View this message in context: http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/Neo4j-server-plugin-tp3521193p351.html Sent from the Neo4j Community Discussions ma

Re: [Neo4j] REST, Gremlin and transactions (neo4django's type hierarchy)

2011-11-19 Thread Matt Luongo
Peter, That plus the Gremlin docs both helped. LockManager was actually the difficult piece of the puzzle- even once I knew the name of the class and had the java docs, some things online seemed to suggest that closing a transaction would release read locks (not true, in my experience thus far).

Re: [Neo4j] REST, Gremlin and transactions (neo4django's type hierarchy)

2011-11-19 Thread Peter Neubauer
Great Matt, Did you find this via http://docs.neo4j.org/chunked/snapshot/gremlin-plugin.html#rest-api-send-an-arbitrary-groovy-script---lucene-sortingor should it be better documented? On Nov 19, 2011 9:56 PM, "Matt Luongo" wrote: > Aha! Scratched my own itch. For anyone interested... > > I found

Re: [Neo4j] REST, Gremlin and transactions (neo4django's type hierarchy)

2011-11-19 Thread Matt Luongo
Aha! Scratched my own itch. For anyone interested... I found Gremlin's getRawGraph(), which let's me play with the LockManager. g.setMaxBufferSize(0) g.startTransaction() lockManager = g.getRawGraph().getConfig().getLockManager() locked = [] curVertex = g.v(0) for (def ty

Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll

2011-11-19 Thread Peter Bell
Uservoice might be a good fit. I used it for feature voting on as OSS project and it worked out pretty well... Sent from my iPhone On Nov 19, 2011, at 2:11 PM, Nigel Small wrote: > Actually sounds like we may have finally found a use for Google Wave! :-P > > On 19 Nov 2011 13:09, "Pablo Parej

Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll

2011-11-19 Thread Peter Neubauer
LOL On Nov 19, 2011 8:12 PM, "Nigel Small" wrote: > Actually sounds like we may have finally found a use for Google Wave! :-P > > On 19 Nov 2011 13:09, "Pablo Pareja" wrote: > > > Yeah it'd be great having something more wiki-like that everyone could > > edit. > > I have no idea though about how

Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll

2011-11-19 Thread Nigel Small
Actually sounds like we may have finally found a use for Google Wave! :-P On 19 Nov 2011 13:09, "Pablo Pareja" wrote: > Yeah it'd be great having something more wiki-like that everyone could > edit. > I have no idea though about how could this be done > Any ideas? > > Pablo > > On Sat, Nov 1

Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll

2011-11-19 Thread Pablo Pareja
Yeah it'd be great having something more wiki-like that everyone could edit. I have no idea though about how could this be done Any ideas? Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Nigel Small wrote: > How about something like Wufoo? > > http://www.wufoo.com/ > > > *Ni

Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll

2011-11-19 Thread Nigel Small
How about something like Wufoo? http://www.wufoo.com/ *Nigel Small* Phone: +44 7814 638 246 Blog: http://nigelsmall.name/ GTalk: ni...@nigelsmall.name MSN: nasm...@live.co.uk Skype: technige Twitter: @technige LinkedIn: http://uk.linkedin

Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll

2011-11-19 Thread Peter Neubauer
I really like this. Is there any other transparent public method you poll, like a Google form that everyone can edit? On Nov 19, 2011 7:19 PM, "Pablo Pareja" wrote: > I just added a link for every possible upcoming feature and created an > issue for those which didn't have one so far. > > Sorry f

Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll

2011-11-19 Thread Pablo Pareja
I just added a link for every possible upcoming feature and created an issue for those which didn't have one so far. Sorry for those who voted already but since the options changed, their vote was lost, could you please vote again? >From now on every time we add a new feature to the poll we should

Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j server plugin

2011-11-19 Thread Michael Hunger
Your plugin should get the start and end node via the plugin API: http://docs.neo4j.org/chunked/snapshot/server-plugins.html (see the GetAll.java example). And then execute something like this (from DatabaseActions.traverse()). using: TraverserReturnType.FullPath public ListRepresentation tr

Re: [Neo4j] Gremlin Script broken in 1.5 GA

2011-11-19 Thread Marko Rodriguez
Hi, With Gremlin 1.3, filter{} is required. No shorthands. Thus, outE{} needs to be outE.filter{}. Moreover, you can now do out(label) or outE(label). HTH, Marko. http://markorodriguez.com On Nov 19, 2011 10:25 AM, "Haensel" wrote: Don't know if this is a bug or a feature, so here we go: In

[Neo4j] Gremlin Script broken in 1.5 GA

2011-11-19 Thread Haensel
Don't know if this is a bug or a feature, so here we go: In 1.5.M01 I used a gremlin query to find edges like that: '{"script":"g.v(1).outE{it.label==\"relationshipName\"}"}' which now leads to a MissingMethod exception in 1.5 GA: "javax.script.ScriptException: groovy.lang.MissingMethodExcept

[Neo4j] Neo4j server plugin

2011-11-19 Thread Shireesh
Hi All, I am new to neo4j and been trying to use server plugin. Iam working on getting all paths between two nodes using GraphAlgoFactory getAllPaths. The problem is i need the same response as we get when using Neo4j server api Traversal "fullpath". /fullpath - contains full representations of

Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll

2011-11-19 Thread Pablo Pareja
Ok, I just did that for the first one; the bad thing about this is that every time I edit one of the options, all the votes cast for it get lost and you have to edit your vote again... So maybe from now on I'd be better adding new features to the poll only once their respective issues has been rise

Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll

2011-11-19 Thread Pablo Pareja
Yeah that'd be cool, if you give me the links I can put them as part of the options themselves (with bit.ly or something like that). Cheers, Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Peter Neubauer < peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com> wrote: > Guys, > This is great! Could you raise issues for these

Re: [Neo4j] The cypher project in neo4j-community has errors in eclipse

2011-11-19 Thread Peter Neubauer
Nice talking to you, too, Eric! I think a simple clean on all projects dies the trick most of the time. Seems the different plugins sometimes have some difficulty in picking up each others changes :-\ On Nov 19, 2011 4:03 PM, "Eric Liang" wrote: > Thanks Peter for your kind help, it was so nice t

Re: [Neo4j] The cypher project in neo4j-community has errors in eclipse

2011-11-19 Thread Eric Liang
Thanks Peter for your kind help, it was so nice talking to you. I guess it would be help to close this question by posting the solution though it's something tricky. To solve this, at least right now, you can do 1) close all the neo4j-community related projects except the neo4j-cypher and then 2)

Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll

2011-11-19 Thread Peter Neubauer
Guys, This is great! Could you raise issues for these and we mitigate missing voting on Github with this, linking back to github for discussion? On Nov 19, 2011 1:09 PM, "Pablo Pareja" wrote: > @Linan get_or_create feature added ;) > @Mattias I mean being required to specify a node type at creati

Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll

2011-11-19 Thread Pablo Pareja
@Linan get_or_create feature added ;) @Mattias I mean being required to specify a node type at creation time, (as how things are right now with relationships) On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Mattias Persson wrote: > hat exactly does mandatory node types mean? > > 2011/11/19 Pablo Pareja > > > H

Re: [Neo4j] Scalability Roadmap

2011-11-19 Thread Mattias Persson
I don't know if a node with a hundred relationships can be considered a super node though. Loading a hundred relationships is pretty fast and warm nodes (all its relationships in cache) is already fast on these things. I'm planning on maybe switch internal store representation on a given threshold

Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll

2011-11-19 Thread Mattias Persson
hat exactly does mandatory node types mean? 2011/11/19 Pablo Pareja > Hi all, > > I was thinking it'd be cool to create a sort of a poll in order to know > which features (that are missing right now...) are the most important ones > for the community. I just did a quick google search for free on

Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll

2011-11-19 Thread Linan Wang
the top feature i want: node insertion with checking of uniq external id: get_or_create On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Pablo Pareja wrote: > Hi all, > > I was thinking it'd be cool to create a sort of a poll in order to know > which features (that are missing right now...) are the most importa

Re: [Neo4j] Max flow using gremlin

2011-11-19 Thread Peter Neubauer
Bring it on man! On Nov 19, 2011 12:38 PM, "Alfredas Chmieliauskas" wrote: > Great! I am sure there will be more cool "gassy" queries to come :) > > A > > On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Peter Neubauer > wrote: > > Aand - done. > > > > > http://docs.neo4j.org/chunked/snapshot/gremlin-plugi

Re: [Neo4j] Scalability Roadmap

2011-11-19 Thread Krzysztof Raczyński
Great, since my schema is a tree (1 incoming, up to hundred of outcoming) i was worried about that. ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user

[Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll

2011-11-19 Thread Pablo Pareja
Hi all, I was thinking it'd be cool to create a sort of a poll in order to know which features (that are missing right now...) are the most important ones for the community. I just did a quick google search for free online poll creation platforms and found doodle site, (btw do you know a better si

Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j-Scala Wrapper 0.1.0 released

2011-11-19 Thread Christopher Schmidt
I've made an "dirty" hack how a traversal (query) DSL could look like in Scala. I pushed the code to here . The "query" uses a collections of nodes (nodeMap is a HashMap mapping St

Re: [Neo4j] Max flow using gremlin

2011-11-19 Thread Alfredas Chmieliauskas
Great! I am sure there will be more cool "gassy" queries to come :) A On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Peter Neubauer wrote: > Aand - done. > > http://docs.neo4j.org/chunked/snapshot/gremlin-plugin.html#rest-api-flow-algroithms-with-gremlin > > Enjoy! > > Cheers, > > /peter neubauer > > GTa

Re: [Neo4j] Scalability Roadmap

2011-11-19 Thread Mattias Persson
2011/11/19 Krzysztof Raczyński > On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Mattias Persson > wrote: > > 2011/11/18 serge > > Specifically what's bad about how they are handled is that to get any > > relationship from a node they all have to be loaded once first into > cache, > > regardless of which typ

Re: [Neo4j] Max flow using gremlin

2011-11-19 Thread Peter Neubauer
Sorry, had a typo in the title, http://docs.neo4j.org/chunked/snapshot/gremlin-plugin.html#rest-api-flow-algorithms-with-gremlin Cheers, /peter neubauer GTalk: neubauer.peter Skype peter.neubauer Phone +46 704 106975 LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer Twitter ht

Re: [Neo4j] Scalability Roadmap

2011-11-19 Thread Krzysztof Raczyński
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Mattias Persson wrote: > 2011/11/18 serge > Specifically what's bad about how they are handled is that to get any > relationship from a node they all have to be loaded once first into cache, > regardless of which type you requested. Does this also pertain to rel

Re: [Neo4j] Max flow using gremlin

2011-11-19 Thread Peter Neubauer
Aand - done. http://docs.neo4j.org/chunked/snapshot/gremlin-plugin.html#rest-api-flow-algroithms-with-gremlin Enjoy! Cheers, /peter neubauer GTalk: neubauer.peter Skype peter.neubauer Phone +46 704 106975 LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer Twitter http://t

Re: [Neo4j] Scalability Roadmap

2011-11-19 Thread Mattias Persson
2011/11/18 serge > Are these following topics will be treated in future release (and when if > you > know) ? > > 1/ Supernode > > I know there is a big downside in handle of super-nodes, which can be a big > issue in a twitter-like website with, for example a user followed by more > than 200k use

Re: [Neo4j] [URGENT] Recommended server configurations

2011-11-19 Thread Michael Hunger
the batch API also has batch insertion operations could describe your domain model w/ estimated counts of entities and cardinalities. snd equally important the typical usecases and what percentages of the dataset they would touch mobile mail please excuse brevity and typos Am 18.11.2011 um 22