Re: [Neo4j] Cypher - variable length relationships that *aren't* of a type

2011-12-08 Thread Matt Luongo
ypher did do this, > but it's been changed for quite some time now. Ah! I saw some mention of subgraph generation and filtering being separate. I thought that was pretty dumb, but with all the talk about Cypher's mediocre performance I was worried it was true. Thanks for educating m

[Neo4j] Cypher - variable length relationships that *aren't* of a type

2011-12-08 Thread Matt Luongo
complish what I need in the match clause? Basically, some way to say "any relationship but these types, path length 0-5". Thanks! -- Matt Luongo Co-Founder, Scholr.ly ___ NOTICE: THIS MAILING LIST IS BEING SWITCHED TO GOOGLE GROUPS, please regis

Re: [Neo4j] [Neo4j-User] Re: Unique constraint and transaction over REST

2011-12-05 Thread Matt Luongo
Haha, looking forward to hearing your thoughts. -- Matt Luongo Co-Founder, Scholr.ly On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Marko Rodriguez wrote: > > > We have an alpha release coming up- would you be interested in seeing > what > > we have? > > Oh would I! Golly gee. &

Re: [Neo4j] Unique constraint and transaction over REST

2011-12-05 Thread Matt Luongo
ed in seeing what we have? -- Matt Luongo Co-Founder, Scholr.ly On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Marko Rodriguez wrote: > Hey, > > Matt: This isn't related to this thread, but I noticed you are from > Scholar.ly. I thought you might like this: > >http://arxiv

Re: [Neo4j] Unique constraint and transaction over REST

2011-12-03 Thread Matt Luongo
aversal pruning and templating Gremlin, all in the name of performance... -- Matt Luongo Co-Founder, Scholr.ly On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 2:38 AM, dnagir wrote: > Thanks Matt. > > Yeah. I think the transaction API is in making. Would be great addition. > > The server-side plugin w

Re: [Neo4j] Unique constraint and transaction over REST

2011-12-03 Thread Matt Luongo
I've run into this problem, and resorted to using the Gremlin/Groovy over REST (via the server-included plugin). There really isn't a way to transactionally express a conditional (or get-or-create) like that over the vanilla REST API, though I'm sure it's in the works. -- Ma

Re: [Neo4j] Will there ever be a native SDK for Node.js?

2011-12-03 Thread Matt Luongo
to the JVM, this would be possible. A quick search didn't find a JPype equivalent for Node, but at least the possibility is hinted at on SO - http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4729013/can-i-call-java-from-node-js-via-jni-and-how -- Matt Luongo Co-Founder, Scholr.ly ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user

Re: [Neo4j] SO Question for Pythonistas: ORM for Neo4j ?

2011-12-02 Thread Matt Luongo
Put my thoughts in :) -- Matt Luongo Co-Founder, Scholr.ly On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Michael Hunger < michael.hun...@neotechnology.com> wrote: > Please help answering him, > > thanks a lot. > > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8356626/orm-with-graph-databa

Re: [Neo4j] REST, Gremlin and transactions (neo4django's type hierarchy)

2011-11-20 Thread Matt Luongo
Ah, thanks Mattias. -- Matt Luongo Co-Founder, Scholr.ly On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 6:12 AM, Mattias Persson wrote: > you must add manually taken locks to LockReleaser to tie them to the > current transaction, otherwise thet will not be released when finishing the > transaction > &g

Re: [Neo4j] REST, Gremlin and transactions (neo4django's type hierarchy)

2011-11-19 Thread Matt Luongo
). For posterity -> http://wiki.neo4j.org/content/Locks and http://wiki.neo4j.org/content/Transactions#Isolation were both very helpful. -- Matt Luongo Co-Founder, Scholr.ly On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Peter Neubauer < peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com> wrote: > Great Matt, &g

Re: [Neo4j] REST, Gremlin and transactions (neo4django's type hierarchy)

2011-11-19 Thread Matt Luongo
k on the reference node, which stinks, but it's what the problem required. I'm going to memoize the result of this client-side so it only gets called a couple times. -- Matt Luongo Co-Founder, Scholr.ly On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Matt Luongo wrote: > Guys, > > I'

[Neo4j] REST, Gremlin and transactions (neo4django's type hierarchy)

2011-11-18 Thread Matt Luongo
ignorance, but I've tried to do my homework. http://wiki.neo4j.org/content/Transactions#Isolation leads me to believe that maybe code like above won't work, because it only writes on condition after a read, but doesn't have a read lock. Could this be the case? and if so, is there a

Re: [Neo4j] Scalability Roadmap

2011-11-18 Thread Matt Luongo
Jim, Not to nitpick, but that's for an ideal graph partitioning, not graph sharding overall, right? Eg the problem is solvable in many specific domains? - Matt On Nov 18, 2011 1:27 PM, "Jim Webber" wrote: > > 1/ Supernode > > 2012, around Q2. > > > 2/ Sharding and horizontal scalability > > 201

Re: [Neo4j] Executing arbitrary code through REST (was: Specifying "best first" order of traverse over REST API)

2011-08-26 Thread Matt Luongo
Looks like the best-order stuff is being covered just fine in the other thread, nevermind :) -- Matt Luongo Co-Founder, Scholr.ly On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Matt Luongo wrote: > Peter, > > The arbitrary Groovy is great, but if I understand correctly, there still

Re: [Neo4j] Executing arbitrary code through REST (was: Specifying "best first" order of traverse over REST API)

2011-08-26 Thread Matt Luongo
Maybe the solution would be to re-run the traversal each time, and then return different slices, but that's a pretty painful tradeoff. -- Matt Luongo Co-Founder, Scholr.ly On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Matt Luongo wrote: > You can run the script through the Python neo4jrestclient

Re: [Neo4j] Executing arbitrary code through REST (was: Specifying "best first" order of traverse over REST API)

2011-08-26 Thread Matt Luongo
NODE) But I haven't gotten this working quite yet. -- Matt Luongo Co-Founder, Scholr.ly On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Boris Kizelshteyn wrote: > I didn't have luck running it through neo4jrest, but the following function > does the trick for me: > > script = "g.v(

Re: [Neo4j] Specifying "best first" order of traverse over REST API

2011-08-24 Thread Matt Luongo
+1, we could really use that. Client-side sorting sucks. -- Matt Luongo Co-Founder, Scholr.ly On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Aseem Kishore wrote: > I've just spent a bunch of time reading into how one can control the > ordering of a traverse beyond simple "breadth first&

[Neo4j] Announcing neo4django

2011-08-16 Thread Matt Luongo
the original integration on which this was based, and Javier for the REST client it's using now. Please let me know what you think! If you have any questions, or are at all interested in contributing, feel free to talk to me or jump right in on GitHub - I can't wait to get this out i

Re: [Neo4j] auto indexes in REST in 1.4?

2011-07-12 Thread Matt Luongo
+1, we could use configuration through REST as well. -- Matt Luongo Co-Founder, Scholr.ly On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 6:45 AM, mike_t wrote: > Please tell me, how can I do that? I couldn´t find anything about it in the > api doc (http://components.neo4j.org/neo4j-server/snapshot/res

Re: [Neo4j] REST API & LuceneTimeline

2011-06-29 Thread Matt Luongo
If anyone else needs this functionality- we've thrown together a quick plugin for indexing longs at https://github.com/scholrly/neo4j-valuecontext-plugin. -- Matt Luongo Co-Founder, Scholr.ly On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Mattias Persson wrote: > Yes, you're probably

Re: [Neo4j] Auto Indexing for Neo4j

2011-06-28 Thread Matt Luongo
Peter, Did this get done before the feature freeze? I'm still trying to find a way to query/configure an autoindex via REST. -- Matt Luongo Co-Founder, Scholr.ly On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Peter Neubauer < peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com> wrote: > Yes, > configuration

Re: [Neo4j] REST API & LuceneTimeline

2011-06-15 Thread Matt Luongo
It does- awesome, I didn't realize the query syntax would work for numeric fields, as well. Now I just need to figure out how to insert into a numeric field via rest. -- Matt Luongo Co-Founder, Scholr.ly On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Rick Bullotta wrote: > Hi, Matt. > > We

Re: [Neo4j] REST API & LuceneTimeline

2011-06-15 Thread Matt Luongo
is there currently some way to index and query numerically via the REST API? -- Matt Luongo Co-Founder, Scholr.ly On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Peter Neubauer wrote: > Yeah, > just checked with Mattias. There is no such index configuration, so > this does not work. I think you shoul

Re: [Neo4j] REST API & LuceneTimeline

2011-06-15 Thread Matt Luongo
I guess the other question is how I might accomplish range queries, using REST. -- Matt Luongo Co-Founder, Scholr.ly On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Matt Luongo wrote: > Rick, > > Is there a sensible way to do that while accessing the index via REST? > I'd prefer if I

Re: [Neo4j] REST API & LuceneTimeline

2011-06-15 Thread Matt Luongo
Rick, Is there a sensible way to do that while accessing the index via REST? I'd prefer if I could create *and* access the index via the REST interface, but just querying and inserting into the index would be great. -- Matt Luongo Co-Founder, Scholr.ly On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 8:55 AM,

Re: [Neo4j] REST API & LuceneTimeline

2011-06-15 Thread Matt Luongo
4/db/data/index/node curl -HContent-Type:application/json -X POST -d \ '"http://localhost:7474/db/data/node/0";' \ http://localhost:7474/db/data/index/node/time/timestamp/25 which gives a 500. -- Matt Luongo Co-Founder, Scholr.ly On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Rick Bullot

Re: [Neo4j] REST API & LuceneTimeline

2011-06-15 Thread Matt Luongo
- Your high performance graph database. > http://startupbootcamp.org/- Öresund - Innovation happens HERE. > http://www.thoughtmade.com - Scandinavia's coolest Bring-a-Thing party. > > > > On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:16 PM, Matt Luongo wrote: >> Forgive me if th

[Neo4j] REST API & LuceneTimeline

2011-05-30 Thread Matt Luongo
a timeline by specifying just a timestamp, not key/value, but I can only find REST examples for indexing nodes by key/value. Anyone care to share a code snippet? -- Matt Luongo Co-Founder, Scholr.ly ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://li

Re: [Neo4j] Indexing vs 1.5 million relationships

2011-05-14 Thread Matt Luongo
Thanks Rick! I totally forgot about transaction cost. Sounds like it'll be index based. -- Matt Luongo Co-Founder, Scholr.ly On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Rick Bullotta wrote: > If you'll be adding/removing nodes constantly, definitely use Lucene > indexing rathe

[Neo4j] Indexing vs 1.5 million relationships

2011-05-14 Thread Matt Luongo
ndering is- would it be more performant to build a type hierarchy and retrieve instances through an index, or to stick with this architecture, and suffer 1.5 million relationships to a single type node? Thanks in advance, -- Matt Luongo Co-Founder,