Re: [Neo] Conneg in REST API

2010-04-21 Thread Mattias Persson
You mean using the Content-Type/Accept headers? That's at least how it's solved now with text/html and application/json living side to side in the REST API today. 2010/3/23 Jim Webber j...@webber.name Just another thought: if we're going to use multiple representation formats, then we should

Re: [Neo] Conneg in REST API

2010-04-21 Thread Jim Webber
Hi Mattias, Yeah, that's what I meant. I really should update my source one of these days... Jim On 21 Apr 2010, at 11:11, Mattias Persson wrote: You mean using the Content-Type/Accept headers? That's at least how it's solved now with text/html and application/json living side to side in the

Re: [Neo] Conneg in REST API

2010-04-21 Thread rick . bullotta
... e.g. someURL?_acceptHeaders=text/xml;application/thingworx;bloodtype/apos Original Message Subject: Re: [Neo] Conneg in REST API From: Jim Webber j...@webber.name Date: Wed, April 21, 2010 7:00 am To: Neo user discussions user@lists.neo4j.org

Re: [Neo] Conneg in REST API

2010-04-21 Thread Jim Webber
;bloodtype/apos Original Message Subject: Re: [Neo] Conneg in REST API From: Jim Webber j...@webber.name Date: Wed, April 21, 2010 7:00 am To: Neo user discussions user@lists.neo4j.org Hey Peter, If we really want to cater for non-compliant

[Neo] Conneg in REST API

2010-03-23 Thread Jim Webber
Just another thought: if we're going to use multiple representation formats, then we should use content negotiation. Jim ___ Neo mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user