Re: [Neo] Fwd: Feedback request

2010-04-21 Thread Niels Hoogeveen
The updates are in SVN now. > Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:43:12 +0200 > From: matt...@neotechnology.com > To: user@lists.neo4j.org > Subject: Re: [Neo] Fwd: Feedback request > > 2010/4/21 Niels Hoogeveen > > > > > I agree with your observations and cha

Re: [Neo] Fwd: Feedback request

2010-04-21 Thread Mattias Persson
e in the three range > implementations. > > I will bump the version in the POM and push the changes into SVN today. > Brilliant! yep we can deal with the rest of the duplication/issues at a later time. > > Niels Hoogeveen > > > Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:51:05 +0200 > >

Re: [Neo] Fwd: Feedback request

2010-04-21 Thread Niels Hoogeveen
ay. Niels Hoogeveen > Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:51:05 +0200 > From: matt...@neotechnology.com > To: user@lists.neo4j.org > Subject: [Neo] Fwd: Feedback request > > Forgot to CC the mailing list > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Mattias Persson > Date: 2

[Neo] Fwd: Feedback request

2010-04-21 Thread Mattias Persson
Forgot to CC the mailing list -- Forwarded message -- From: Mattias Persson Date: 2010/4/21 Subject: Re: Feedback request To: Niels Hoogeveen Cc: Neo Devteam I'd say go for it, but you could bump the version (in pom.xml) to 0.9-SNAPSHOT before committing so that it doesn't bre