Hi guys,
Sorry if you have already seen this (Twitter, Gremlin mailing list, etc.), but
for those that haven't, this is of potential interest to all you Neo4j users.
http://markorodriguez.com/Blarko/Entries/2010/3/29_MySQL_vs._Neo4j_on_a_Large-Scale_Graph_Traversal.html
Take care,
Marko.
http:
Hu... I'm surprised.
I expected the test to be unfair in favor of mysql for a simple graph traversal.
In fact, i still think that with good mysql configuration and good sql
tuning, mysql can be faster.
Of course, if you add different kind of relationship, node property,
relationship property a
Yup,
that is our assessment, too. On 1-3 joins there is a chance to
optimize the queries in an RDBMS. But still you have indexes instead
of references, and the overhead of serialization through the JDBC
driver. Anyway, it even shows that Java based DBs are not necessarily
slower than C based.
Then
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Peter Neubauer
wrote:
>
> MySQL degrades as the data volume increases, and as the depth
> increases (at depth 5 MySQL just hangs).
You used MyIsam ? InnoDB ?
What about postgresql ? (which is not supposed to be faster than
MyIsam, but usually faster than InnoDB)
Not sure about the MySQL flavor,
Marko has been doing the tests on his machine ...
Cheers,
/peter neubauer
COO and Sales, Neo Technology
GTalk: neubauer.peter
Skype peter.neubauer
Phone +46 704 106975
LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer
Twitter http://twitter.co
--
From: Laurent Laborde
Sender: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org
To: Neo user discussions
ReplyTo: Neo user discussions
Subject: Re: [Neo] MySQL vs. Neo4j in a Breadth-First Graph Traversal
Sent: Mar 30, 2010 3:11 AM
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Peter Neubauer
wrote:
>
> MySQL degrades as th
Hi,
> You used MyIsam ? InnoDB ?
> What about postgresql ? (which is not supposed to be faster than
> MyIsam, but usually faster than InnoDB)
I used MyISAM.
Marko.
http://markorodriguez.com
___
Neo mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4
7 matches
Mail list logo
