Re: [Neo4j] Cypher syntax feedback wanted

2011-11-28 Thread Andres Taylor
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Andres Taylor < andres.tay...@neotechnology.com> wrote: > Hi all! > > I'm looking to make Cypher more consistent, and so less surprising. Cypher > today has two places where predicates are used, the WHERE clause, and for > the ALL/ANY/NONE/SINGLE functions. > > It

Re: [Neo4j] Cypher syntax feedback wanted

2011-11-04 Thread Andres Taylor
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 7:11 AM, KanTube wrote: > i am just a little confused on this. are you going to still keep the > syntax > with a ":" for relationship ie. > > START n=node(3) > MATCH (n)-[:BLOCKS]->(x) > RETURN x > > and then if you wanted to have a more complex match you would do somethin

Re: [Neo4j] Cypher syntax feedback wanted

2011-11-03 Thread KanTube
context: http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/Neo4j-Cypher-syntax-feedback-wanted-tp3460651p3479337.html Sent from the Neo4j Community Discussions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Neo4j mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user

Re: [Neo4j] Cypher syntax feedback wanted

2011-10-31 Thread Mattias Persson
2011/10/28 Andres Taylor > Hi all! > > I'm looking to make Cypher more consistent, and so less surprising. Cypher > today has two places where predicates are used, the WHERE clause, and for > the ALL/ANY/NONE/SINGLE functions. > > It looks like: > > WHERE > ALL( in : ) > etc > > Any progress on

[Neo4j] Cypher syntax feedback wanted

2011-10-28 Thread Andres Taylor
Hi all! I'm looking to make Cypher more consistent, and so less surprising. Cypher today has two places where predicates are used, the WHERE clause, and for the ALL/ANY/NONE/SINGLE functions. It looks like: WHERE ALL( in : ) etc Now I'm thinking about adding preciates to the MATCH clause, e.g