On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Andres Taylor <
andres.tay...@neotechnology.com> wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I'm looking to make Cypher more consistent, and so less surprising. Cypher
> today has two places where predicates are used, the WHERE clause, and for
> the ALL/ANY/NONE/SINGLE functions.
>
> It
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 7:11 AM, KanTube wrote:
> i am just a little confused on this. are you going to still keep the
> syntax
> with a ":" for relationship ie.
>
> START n=node(3)
> MATCH (n)-[:BLOCKS]->(x)
> RETURN x
>
> and then if you wanted to have a more complex match you would do somethin
context:
http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/Neo4j-Cypher-syntax-feedback-wanted-tp3460651p3479337.html
Sent from the Neo4j Community Discussions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
2011/10/28 Andres Taylor
> Hi all!
>
> I'm looking to make Cypher more consistent, and so less surprising. Cypher
> today has two places where predicates are used, the WHERE clause, and for
> the ALL/ANY/NONE/SINGLE functions.
>
> It looks like:
>
> WHERE
> ALL( in : )
> etc
>
> Any progress on
Hi all!
I'm looking to make Cypher more consistent, and so less surprising. Cypher
today has two places where predicates are used, the WHERE clause, and for
the ALL/ANY/NONE/SINGLE functions.
It looks like:
WHERE
ALL( in : )
etc
Now I'm thinking about adding preciates to the MATCH clause, e.g
5 matches
Mail list logo