Re: [Neo4j] HA consistency

2011-08-26 Thread Mattias Persson
2011/8/19 Tuure Laurinolli > > On Aug 19, 2011, at 07:57 , David Rader wrote: > > > It looks like the HA implementation is for eventual consistency, tunable > by how often a slave polls the master for updates from other nodes. > > > > With a load balanced cluster, is the best practice to simply u

Re: [Neo4j] HA Consistency

2011-08-23 Thread Peter Neubauer
ster and > dynamically update a load balancer to correctly direct traffic? > Or, what's the best way to update DNS entries to point to a > master.neocluster.company.com vs. slave.neocluster.company.com or such? > > Thanks > Dave > > > Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 11:12

Re: [Neo4j] HA Consistency

2011-08-19 Thread David Rader
neocluster.company.com vs. slave.neocluster.company.com or such? Thanks Dave Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 11:12:05 +0300 From: Tuure Laurinolli Subject: Re: [Neo4j] HA consistency To: Neo4j user discussions Message-ID: <4d3381ef-89dc-402f-9efe-77d72131e...@portalify.com> Content-Type: text/plain; cha

Re: [Neo4j] HA consistency

2011-08-19 Thread Tuure Laurinolli
On Aug 19, 2011, at 07:57 , David Rader wrote: > It looks like the HA implementation is for eventual consistency, tunable by > how often a slave polls the master for updates from other nodes. > > With a load balanced cluster, is the best practice to simply use sticky > sessions on clients to e

[Neo4j] HA consistency

2011-08-18 Thread David Rader
It looks like the HA implementation is for eventual consistency, tunable by how often a slave polls the master for updates from other nodes. With a load balanced cluster, is the best practice to simply use sticky sessions on clients to ensure that immediate reads of updated data are served by t