Re: [Neo4j] Isolation Level.

2010/5/31, Marko Rodriguez : > Hi, > > Okay. I just removed it from Blueprints and everything compiled and all the > test cases passed. Thus, all is "perfect." :) > Yep, aint that swell :) > Thanks, > Marko. > > On May 31, 2010, at 9:20 AM, Mattias Persson wrote: > >> To clarify: the Isolation leve

Re: [Neo4j] Isolation Level.

Hi, Okay. I just removed it from Blueprints and everything compiled and all the test cases passed. Thus, all is "perfect." :) Thanks, Marko. On May 31, 2010, at 9:20 AM, Mattias Persson wrote: > To clarify: the Isolation levels (and implementation of it) in index > service had a lot of problem

Re: [Neo4j] Isolation Level.

To clarify: the Isolation levels (and implementation of it) in index service had a lot of problems which should've displayed themselves if someone actually used them. I saw that blueprints used Isolation.SAME_TX which is the default (and the only useful isolation, looking at the code). Based on th

Re: [Neo4j] Isolation Level.

Just don't use it and you'll be fine 2010/5/31, Marko Rodriguez : > Hello, > > The following method seems to have gone away from the Neo4j API: > > LuceneIndexService.setIsolation(Isolation.SAME_TX); > > Just comment it out and no longer use it? Or has it morphed into something > else? > > Thanks,

[Neo4j] Isolation Level.

Hello, The following method seems to have gone away from the Neo4j API: LuceneIndexService.setIsolation(Isolation.SAME_TX); Just comment it out and no longer use it? Or has it morphed into something else? Thanks, Marko. http://markorodriguez.com http://tinkerpop.com ___