api" is not a great name, it says what it does, but
>> certainly has little appeal. So I will be happy if someone can come up
with
>> something sexier.
>> Niels
>> > From: peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com
>> > Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 15:42:13 +0200
>> >
me, it says what it does, but
> certainly has little appeal. So I will be happy if someone can come up with
> something sexier.
> Niels
> > From: peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com
> > Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 15:42:13 +0200
> > To: user@lists.neo4j.org
> > Subject: Re:
Beautiful.
Thank you very much :)
Jon
On Sep 25, 2011 5:48 AM, "Peter Hunsberger [via Neo4j Community
Discussions]" wrote:
>
>
> I'm going to take a slightly different tack here than the responses you've
> got so far...
>
> First as others have pointed out, this is three entities and two
> relat
I'm going to take a slightly different tack here than the responses you've
got so far...
First as others have pointed out, this is three entities and two
relationships
joe - is a - janitor - at the - school
This is important, the lighter weight the relationships, the less problem
you are goi
So... that type of modeling is more inline with NLP and Noun / Verb Property
linkage. Which you can do. Do you need to also then describe semantically
the WORKS_AT relationship ? You could give all relationships themselves
describing properties, OR perhaps just link them to a SKOS_CONCEPT of _wor
What if:
Joe WORKS_AT the school
Joe WORKS_AS a janitor
The school HAS_A janitor
How do I denote that Joe works as I janitor at that exact school?
Do you see other problems in the notation above?
Also, thank you very much for your thought inspiring reply!
Jon
On Sep 24, 2011 7:55 PM, "Thad Guid
Unfortunately, most of what I describe as best practices in modeling
"semantic relationships" has not been written well ENOUGH in most books.
However the W3C community lists such as SKOS and RDFa have many experts
that have deep knowledge around those best practices. Asking your questions
there o
Hmm.. Which book would you recommend me to read?
Jon
On Sep 24, 2011 7:55 PM, "Thad Guidry [via Neo4j Community Discussions]" <
ml-node+s438527n3364798...@n3.nabble.com> wrote:
>
>
> Quite wrong.
>
> IS_JANITOR_OF will stick you into a boxed node ordinal.
> What you really want when modeling the w
Quite wrong.
IS_JANITOR_OF will stick you into a boxed node ordinal.
What you really want when modeling the world is to only capture the
"semantic relationships" themselves. IS_A being a core semantic
relationship. I am a janitor. He IS_A janitor. What is a janitor ? What
properties does a ja
onstructs through implicit conversions. Working in both
disciplines at the same time (poor-man type classes through implicit
conversions in combination with subtyping) seems to be non-trivial.
Niels
> Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 08:09:48 -0700
> From: lold...@gmail.com
> To: user@lists.neo4j.
ept for the implementation of it.
Niels
> From: rick.bullo...@thingworx.com
> To: user@lists.neo4j.org
> Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 06:37:43 -0700
> Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Modelling with neo4j
>
> That's a great summary, Niels. Very similar to how we've applied Neo4J here
&g
o your heart's content.
>
> Finally, I see two of the layers you describe. For some applications it is
necessary to have something akin to a type system, and Enhanced API offers
you the hooks to create one. I don't immediately see what the purpose is of
the interface layer. Could you
someone can come up with something
sexier.
Niels
> From: peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com
> Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 15:42:13 +0200
> To: user@lists.neo4j.org
> Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Modelling with neo4j
>
> Great thoughts guys!
> I think it would be interesting to break
s.
>
> Rick
>
> ____
> From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On Behalf
> Of Niels Hoogeveen [pd_aficion...@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2011 9:14 AM
> To: user@lists.neo4j.org
> Subject: Re: [N
gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2011 1:52 AM
To: user@lists.neo4j.org
Subject: [Neo4j] Modelling with neo4j
I'm trying to figure out how to model the world most flexibly (okay, so I'm
sticking to modelling organisations for now, but still). My main problem
seems to occur when I w
un...@lists.neo4j.org [user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On Behalf Of
Niels Hoogeveen [pd_aficion...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2011 9:14 AM
To: user@lists.neo4j.org
Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Modelling with neo4j
You raise interesting questions, most of them very much related to the work I
d
to have something akin to a type system, and Enhanced API offers you
the hooks to create one. I don't immediately see what the purpose is of the
interface layer. Could you expand on that feature a bit more, so I may help you
figure out how to tackle that issue.
Niels
> Date: Fri, 23
I'm trying to figure out how to model the world most flexibly (okay, so I'm
sticking to modelling organisations for now, but still). My main problem
seems to occur when I want to allow the model to naturally expand in
complexity. Say we have the following relationship:
Joe is a janitor at the scho
18 matches
Mail list logo
