Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j Write Performance

For the record, that branch is outdated and not working correctly in HA mode. 2011/9/12 Peter Neubauer > James, > we are experimenting with that feature, namely, not forcing a flush() > at the end of a transaction and let the OS take care of the actual > flushing. You potentially loose some last

Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j Write Performance

James, we are experimenting with that feature, namely, not forcing a flush() at the end of a transaction and let the OS take care of the actual flushing. You potentially loose some last-transaction data, but the store is still going to recover and will not get corrupted. Mattias has been testing th

Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j Write Performance

I added a ticket for this here... https://github.com/neo4j/community/issues/18 -- View this message in context: http://neo4j-community-discussions.438527.n3.nabble.com/Neo4j-Write-Performance-tp3323638p3327618.html Sent from the Neo4j Community Discussions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___

[Neo4j] Neo4j Write Performance

Hi Guys - I have been working on loading WordNet (http://wordnet.princeton.edu/) into Neo4j, and have been using it as an opportunity to tune write performance on Linux for a Web application I am developing. My initial idea was to load WordNet RDF (http://semanticweb.cs.vu.nl/lod/wn30/) through