Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll

+0100 > To: user@lists.neo4j.org > Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll > > Uservoice seems great. If rapportive uses it, > http://feedback.rapportive.com/forums/42557-general then it is good in > my book. I think we should try it if we can integrate t

Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll

Thank you all for participating and give your votes to the options you feel are more important. For sure it'd be great to have another platform to do this that could be somehow integrated with GitHub, ( I just created the poll with doodle because it was the one I found after a quick google search w

Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll

Uservoice seems great. If rapportive uses it, http://feedback.rapportive.com/forums/42557-general then it is good in my book. I think we should try it if we can integrate this with GIThub issues. Pablo, impressive feedback on http://www.doodle.com/wg8k77vwq6b654bv ! I think Mattias will be delight

Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll

Uservoice might be a good fit. I used it for feature voting on as OSS project and it worked out pretty well... Sent from my iPhone On Nov 19, 2011, at 2:11 PM, Nigel Small wrote: > Actually sounds like we may have finally found a use for Google Wave! :-P > > On 19 Nov 2011 13:09, "Pablo Parej

Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll

LOL On Nov 19, 2011 8:12 PM, "Nigel Small" wrote: > Actually sounds like we may have finally found a use for Google Wave! :-P > > On 19 Nov 2011 13:09, "Pablo Pareja" wrote: > > > Yeah it'd be great having something more wiki-like that everyone could > > edit. > > I have no idea though about how

Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll

Actually sounds like we may have finally found a use for Google Wave! :-P On 19 Nov 2011 13:09, "Pablo Pareja" wrote: > Yeah it'd be great having something more wiki-like that everyone could > edit. > I have no idea though about how could this be done > Any ideas? > > Pablo > > On Sat, Nov 1

Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll

Yeah it'd be great having something more wiki-like that everyone could edit. I have no idea though about how could this be done Any ideas? Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Nigel Small wrote: > How about something like Wufoo? > > http://www.wufoo.com/ > > > *Ni

Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll

How about something like Wufoo? http://www.wufoo.com/ *Nigel Small* Phone: +44 7814 638 246 Blog: http://nigelsmall.name/ GTalk: ni...@nigelsmall.name MSN: nasm...@live.co.uk Skype: technige Twitter: @technige LinkedIn: http://uk.linkedin

Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll

I really like this. Is there any other transparent public method you poll, like a Google form that everyone can edit? On Nov 19, 2011 7:19 PM, "Pablo Pareja" wrote: > I just added a link for every possible upcoming feature and created an > issue for those which didn't have one so far. > > Sorry f

Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll

I just added a link for every possible upcoming feature and created an issue for those which didn't have one so far. Sorry for those who voted already but since the options changed, their vote was lost, could you please vote again? >From now on every time we add a new feature to the poll we should

Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll

Ok, I just did that for the first one; the bad thing about this is that every time I edit one of the options, all the votes cast for it get lost and you have to edit your vote again... So maybe from now on I'd be better adding new features to the poll only once their respective issues has been rise

Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll

Yeah that'd be cool, if you give me the links I can put them as part of the options themselves (with bit.ly or something like that). Cheers, Pablo On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Peter Neubauer < peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com> wrote: > Guys, > This is great! Could you raise issues for these

Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll

Guys, This is great! Could you raise issues for these and we mitigate missing voting on Github with this, linking back to github for discussion? On Nov 19, 2011 1:09 PM, "Pablo Pareja" wrote: > @Linan get_or_create feature added ;) > @Mattias I mean being required to specify a node type at creati

Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll

@Linan get_or_create feature added ;) @Mattias I mean being required to specify a node type at creation time, (as how things are right now with relationships) On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Mattias Persson wrote: > hat exactly does mandatory node types mean? > > 2011/11/19 Pablo Pareja > > > H

Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll

hat exactly does mandatory node types mean? 2011/11/19 Pablo Pareja > Hi all, > > I was thinking it'd be cool to create a sort of a poll in order to know > which features (that are missing right now...) are the most important ones > for the community. I just did a quick google search for free on

Re: [Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll

the top feature i want: node insertion with checking of uniq external id: get_or_create On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Pablo Pareja wrote: > Hi all, > > I was thinking it'd be cool to create a sort of a poll in order to know > which features (that are missing right now...) are the most importa

[Neo4j] Neo4j upcoming features importance poll

Hi all, I was thinking it'd be cool to create a sort of a poll in order to know which features (that are missing right now...) are the most important ones for the community. I just did a quick google search for free online poll creation platforms and found doodle site, (btw do you know a better si