Hi Massimo,
I'm terribly sorry, I've had a lot of things on my plate, and this sadly
fell off. Thanks for the reminder!
Could you please try lowering the heap size (to somewhere between 512M-1G
with your available RAM). The Neo4j memory mapping is managed outside of the
Java heap. What you want t
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Tobias Ivarsson
wrote:
> WRT the slowdown you've seen, I'll have to investigate that further.
Didn't mean to bother anyone but do you have any news regarding the
slowdown I'm still experiencing... !?
Cheers
--
Massimo
http://meridio.blogspot.com
___
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Tobias Ivarsson
wrote:
> I recently (yesterday) committed a new feature for Neo4j that will store
> these kinds of short strings, making Neo4j store them without having to
> involve the DynamicStringStore at all. You should see a substantial speedup
> from using t
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Massimo Lusetti wrote:
> I'm trying to populate the DB with Nodes with only one String
> property, an IPv4 address. This is just a test case for my typical use
> case and it shows that when the process starts the first 440744 nodes
> are going in at a speed of 1.0
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Johan Svensson wrote:
> Massimo, you had problems with injection that created duplicates due
> to a synchronization issue. That issue has been resolved and now you
> are experiencing a slowdown during batch inserter injection?
Yep, as I said I basically had saw b
5 matches
Mail list logo