Re: [Neo4j] Transparent Distributed Queries?

2011-10-31 Thread Peter Neubauer
Coolio, let us know when you get going on this, would be superinteresting to see more of your thoughts! Cheers, /peter neubauer GTalk:      neubauer.peter Skype       peter.neubauer Phone       +46 704 106975 LinkedIn   http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer Twitter     

Re: [Neo4j] Transparent Distributed Queries?

2011-10-16 Thread amitp
No problem, I plan to make the code available for free, but there's currently no code, so I'll publish the location of the code repository when I'll write some.. :) -- View this message in context:

Re: [Neo4j] Transparent Distributed Queries?

2011-10-12 Thread Peter Neubauer
Mmh, I would actually do it the other way round - have a number of replicated Neo4j instances (possibly via Neo4j HA, see http://docs.neo4j.org/chunked/snapshot/ha-setup-tutorial.html) and then push traversals via GoldenOrb onto these instances and merge the results. WDYT? Cheers, /peter

Re: [Neo4j] Transparent Distributed Queries?

2011-10-11 Thread Alexander Smirnov
You can try to implement Google Pregel http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1807167.1807184 algorithm on top of Neo4j or use existing implementation http://www.goldenorbos.org/ On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:26 PM, amitp amit.port...@gmail.com wrote: Hey, - I'm designing a P2P application in which

Re: [Neo4j] Transparent Distributed Queries?

2011-10-11 Thread amitp
Hey thanks, I've just read goldenOrb wiki, it's seem related BUT if I understand correctly it's helps just with the distribution. I'm looking for a more complete graph package that can be easily distributed (I don't want to implement my own query engine). So I think I'll need to get into the