Re: Starter Issues

2017-02-01 Thread Andrew Musselman
Adding user. On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 4:14 PM Andrew Palumbo wrote: > bump after JIRA Issue planning email-blast. > > > From: Trevor Grant > Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2017 5:01:21 PM > To: d...@mahout.apache.org > Subject: Starter Issues > > Hey all, > > I know

Re: Mahout ML vs Spark Mlib vs Mahout-Spark integreation

2017-02-01 Thread Dmitriy Lyubimov
Isabel, if i understand it correctly, you are asking whether it makes sense add end2end scenarios based on Samsara to current codebase? The answer is, absolutely. Yes it does for both rather isolated issues (like computing clusters) and end-2-end scenarios. The only problem with end 2 end scenari

Fw: Starter Issues

2017-02-01 Thread Andrew Palumbo
From: Trevor Grant Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2017 5:01 PM To: d...@mahout.apache.org Subject: Starter Issues Hey all, I know there are some folks on here who have been interested in getting more involved with the project, specifically contributing code. Wi

Re: Mahout ML vs Spark Mlib vs Mahout-Spark integreation

2017-02-01 Thread Andrew Palumbo
From: Isabel Drost Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2017 4:55 AM To: Dmitriy Lyubimov Cc: user@mahout.apache.org Subject: Re: Mahout ML vs Spark Mlib vs Mahout-Spark integreation On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 04:06:36PM -0800, Dmitriy Lyubimov wrote: > Except for a sev

Re: Mahout ML vs Spark Mlib vs Mahout-Spark integreation

2017-02-01 Thread Isabel Drost
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 04:06:36PM -0800, Dmitriy Lyubimov wrote: > Except for a several applied > off-the-shelves, Mahout has not (hopefully just yet) developed a > comprehensive set of things to use. Do you think there would be value in having that? Funding aside, would now be a good time to dev