Re: "LLR with time"

2017-11-10 Thread Pat Ferrel
BTW you should take time buckets that are relatively free of daily cycles like 3 day, week, or month buckets for “hot”. This is to remove cyclical affects from the frequencies as much as possible since you need 3 buckets to see the change in change, 2 for the change, and 1 for the event volume.

Re: "LLR with time"

2017-11-10 Thread Pat Ferrel
So your idea is to find anomalies in event frequencies to detect “hot” items? Interesting, maybe Ted will chime in. What I do is take the frequency, first, and second, derivatives as measures of popularity, increasing popularity, and increasingly increasing popularity. Put another way popular,

"LLR with time"

2017-11-10 Thread Johannes Schulte
Hi "all", I am wondering what would be the best way to incorporate event time information into the calculation of the G-Test. There is a claim here https://de.slideshare.net/tdunning/finding-changes-in-real-data saying "Time aware variant of G-Test is possible" I remember i experimented with ex