RE: SSVD: lease conflict due to 2 attempts using the same dir

2014-10-09 Thread Dmitriy Lyubimov
execution is turned > on. > > -- Ken > > > > From: Dmitriy Lyubimov > > Sent: October 9, 2014 11:31:42am PDT > > To: user@mahout.apache.org > > Subject: Re: SSVD: lease conflict due to 2 attempts using the same dir > > > > wow. good to know. however, it wo

RE: SSVD: lease conflict due to 2 attempts using the same dir

2014-10-09 Thread Ken Krugler
true, conf); closeables.addFirst(qhatInput); It wouldn't surprise me if this fails when speculative execution is turned on. -- Ken > From: Dmitriy Lyubimov > Sent: October 9, 2014 11:31:42am PDT > To: user@mahout.apache.org > Subject: Re: SSVD:

Re: SSVD: lease conflict due to 2 attempts using the same dir

2014-10-09 Thread Dmitriy Lyubimov
wow. good to know. however, it would seem to me like a bug in MultipleOutputs? either way, it doesn't seem anything to do with the Mahout code itself. On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Yang wrote: > yes, that's what I'm saying, I disabled speculative, it works for now (kind > of is a hack) > > >

Re: SSVD: lease conflict due to 2 attempts using the same dir

2014-10-09 Thread Yang
yes, that's what I'm saying, I disabled speculative, it works for now (kind of is a hack) also yes, this is hadoop 2.0 with YARN this has nothing to do with overwrite mode. the 2 attempts are run simultaneously because they are speculative runs On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 12:07 AM, Serega Sheypak w

Re: SSVD: lease conflict due to 2 attempts using the same dir

2014-10-08 Thread Serega Sheypak
owned by DFSClient_attempt_1412632629877_7081_*m_00_1_**196610264_1 *but is accessed by DFSClient_attempt_1412632629877_7081_*m_00_0_**1051299648_1* at Looks like two clients try to write to the same dir and they are trying to write to the same file. 2014-10-08 6:24 GMT+04:00 Dmitriy

Re: SSVD: lease conflict due to 2 attempts using the same dir

2014-10-07 Thread Dmitriy Lyubimov
Usually map reduce output format would issue a much clearer message.this on the other hand looks like a name node operation conflict. Sent from my phone. On Oct 7, 2014 3:23 PM, "Suneel Marthi" wrote: > Have u tried running with -ow (overwrite) option, that should clear all > tmpdir between succ

Re: SSVD: lease conflict due to 2 attempts using the same dir

2014-10-07 Thread Suneel Marthi
Have u tried running with -ow (overwrite) option, that should clear all tmpdir between successive runs ?? The SSVD code does clear the tmpdir when -ow is specified. On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Yang wrote: > we are running mahout ssvd, with a --tempDir parameter, > but we are constantly gett

Re: SSVD: lease conflict due to 2 attempts using the same dir

2014-10-07 Thread Dmitriy Lyubimov
Looks like pecularities of a newer hadoop stack.. never saw this before. On Oct 7, 2014 2:55 PM, "Yang" wrote: > we are running mahout ssvd, with a --tempDir parameter, > but we are constantly getting this error below. > > the following seems to suggest that the 2 attempts in mapper are trying t

SSVD: lease conflict due to 2 attempts using the same dir

2014-10-07 Thread Yang
we are running mahout ssvd, with a --tempDir parameter, but we are constantly getting this error below. the following seems to suggest that the 2 attempts in mapper are trying to access the same tmp dir on hdfs. if this is the cause, then ssvd has a bug in that different attempts should use diffe