Niktabar nikta...@yahoo.com wrote:
Thanks Karl, I was thinking that there might be an internal solution but
since it's not I may look into that load balancing workaround
Regards
Kambiz
--
*From:* Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
*To:* user@manifoldcf.apache.org user
Hi Kambiz,
If you want redundancy for document authorization, you would want to
specify the URL of a load balancer (not included), that would send requests
on to multiple authority service instances.
Karl
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 6:13 AM, Kambiz Niktabar nikta...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hello,
By
Hi Shigeki,
The web connector creates a checksum for all content. The checksum has to
match exactly for the content to be reindexed. Of course, computing the
checksum means that the content must be refetched in any case.
Karl
[mailto:adrian.con...@arup.com]
*Sent:* 04 February 2015 17:24
*To:* user@manifoldcf.apache.org
*Subject:* RE: Error: Unexpected jobqueue status
Thanks Karl,
I’ll build/deploy tomorrow and keep you posted.
Adrian
*From:* Karl Wright [mailto:daddy...@gmail.com daddy...@gmail.com]
*Sent
CONNECTORS-1157 for the fix you just provided.
Karl
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Guy,
If you would be willing to create ManifoldCF tickets, and include patches
or code snippets, I can add the functionality into the source tree.
Thanks,
Karl
adrian.con...@arup.com
wrote:
At that point, only a few (three or so) minutes.
I left it for another 5 or 6 six minutes after I grabbed the stack trace
before I finally ‘-9’ed it.
HTH,
Adrian
*From:* Karl Wright [mailto:daddy...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* 04 February 2015 15:21
CONNECTORS-1156.
Karl
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Adrian,
Clearly, the shutdown is happening at a time when ManifoldCF is in the
midst of an ANALYZE TABLE operation. The shutdown is attempting to
interrupt this operation, and is probably
This point release/bug fix release includes the fixes for four critical
tickets that existed in the 2.0 release. You can read about them by
downloading the CHANGES.txt document from the ManifoldCF site.
Thanks to all who made this release possible!
Karl
This point release/bug fix release includes the fixes for four critical
tickets that existed in the 1.8 release. You can read about them by
downloading the CHANGES.txt document from the ManifoldCF site.
Thanks to all who made this release possible!
Karl
Hi Bert,
HSQLDB is fairly aggressive at using memory, to the extent that I believe
it tries to keep entire tables in memory. If you decide to use HSQLDB in
embedded mode, you will therefore have to give MCF memory that is
consistent with your particular task, and expect to run out of memory
am wrong. For 1000 jobs assuming every repository
connector is different from other and max thread per repository connector
is 10 then will there be 10,000 threads spanned for repository connections?
Thanks,
Jitu
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jitu
Hi Guy,
This looks like it was broken during the MCF 1.8 release cycle. I've
created CONNECTORS-1151 to track this; hope to have a patch for you shortly.
Thanks,
Karl
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 5:10 AM, Guy Sperry guyspe...@yahoo.com wrote:
I am unable to get the FileNet connector to process
AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Guy,
This looks like it was broken during the MCF 1.8 release cycle. I've
created CONNECTORS-1151 to track this; hope to have a patch for you shortly.
Thanks,
Karl
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 5:10 AM, Guy Sperry guyspe...@yahoo.com wrote:
I am
)
at org.apache.tools.ant.launch.Launcher.run(Launcher.java:280)
at org.apache.tools.ant.launch.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:109)
Total time: 15 seconds
On Sunday, January 25, 2015 4:19 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Guy,
I've updated the release branches also -- that would
Hi Colin,
There are two buttons on every output connection's view page. These are
meant to handle the case where somebody did something to a downstream
index, and reindexing is needed. That's probably what you want; read up on
them in the manual.
Thanks,
Karl
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 5:58 AM,
,
Karl
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Michael,
I was finally able to reproduce your issue this evening. The possible
change was that connection saves use non-ex write locks now, rather than
exclusive write locks. I've looked carefully at the file
Hi Michael,
I was finally able to reproduce your issue this evening. The possible
change was that connection saves use non-ex write locks now, rather than
exclusive write locks. I've looked carefully at the file-based locking
code for this though and found no obvious problems. I'll keep
they
sort themselves out the next time the job runs? Is there anything I should
do to “help” the job along?
Adrian
*From:* Karl Wright [mailto:daddy...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* 12 January 2015 00:27
*To:* user@manifoldcf.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: Error: Unexpected jobqueue status
Also
Also, if you are having trouble shutting down the agents process, it would
be great if you could get a thread dump and post it, before you kill -9 it.
Karl
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 7:25 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Adrian,
If you noted the comment stream in CONNECTORS-590, I
has helped in any sense for releasing this
version!!
El lunes, 29 de diciembre de 2014, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
escribió:
Apache ManifoldCF 2.0 has officially been released.
ManifoldCF 2.0 is *not* backwards compatible with any ManifoldCF 1.x
release. This allowed
Have you tried export and import? There's a java command for those.
Karl
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 5:21 PM, Colin colinjoyce...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Guys,
I want to migrate my manifold connector and job config across a number
of mcf instances - there will be slight differences between each
Hi Kambiz,
As I mentioned before, ManifoldCF 2.0 is not backwards compatible with MCF
1.x. One of the things that changed is the way obfuscated data is stored.
You appear to have moved the obfuscated postgresql password from MCF 1.x to
2.0, and that will of course not work.
Karl
On Fri, Jan
Apache ManifoldCF 2.0 has officially been released.
ManifoldCF 2.0 is *not* backwards compatible with any ManifoldCF 1.x
release. This allowed for the reduction of the MCF 2.0 schema, the
reorganization of some APIs, and the removal of much duplicate/redundant
functionality.
In addition, the
Apache ManifoldCF 1.8 has officially been released.
ManifoldCF 1.8 is backwards compatible with all ManifoldCF 1.x releases.
Other than for improvements which required non-backwards-compatible
changes, all MCF 2.0 features are also present in MCF 1.8.
The high points of this release are as
);
Thanks,
Jitu
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jitu,
Your client's needs seem rather unusual, and will potentially be
somewhat expensive performance-wise. So unless I hear from others as well
that this is a key feature, there's no point in contributing
Hi Shigeki,
Minimal crawls do not guarantee that there is no document deletion. Such
crawls only do the least amount of work possible based on what model the
underlying connector implements. This often just means not doing the
cleanup phase at the end of the job run, which typically removes
it.
Thanks,
Jitu
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jitu,
You can certainly add a unique string associated with a job to every
document using the Metadata Adjuster transformation connector (which of
course can be the job name). The time of indexing
for the same?
Thanks,
Jitu
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jitu,
I'm sorry for the miscommunication. What I meant is that without any
modifications, you can add the job's name as metadata for all documents
indexed with the job.
If you need
Hi Kambiz,
I presume the Couldn't connect to server: A duplicate name exists on the
network. error occurs on the connection view page? If so, you might be
able to just ignore this error, and type in a path on the Paths tab.
If that doesn't work for you, I can't help you debug your network.
)
at
org.apache.manifoldcf.crawler.system.WorkerThread.run(WorkerThread.java:383)
And another question: I use Solr 4.10 with Tika 1.5. MCF 1.8 have tika
1.6. How this affect document parsing?
K
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 08:45:31AM -0500, Karl Wright wrote:
If you changed this file, you would need to rerun
and no
problem.
Thx Karl for your time.
K
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 07:28:34AM -0500, Karl Wright wrote:
The commons-compress code just makes a simple reference to the Coder
class,
with no reflection or anything suspicious going on.
If you can send me the binary file that causes this issue
does not exist'.
How can I upgrade db schema? I tried ./initialize.sh without success.
K
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 10:40:39AM -0500, Karl Wright wrote:
Ok, committed a fix. CONNECTORS-1121.
Karl
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
wrote:
Ah, thanks
Hi Smitha,
Can you tell me what version of MCF you are using? There was a fix for
this very situation made a while ago, if I recall correctly.
Karl
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 2:51 AM, Smitha S smitha_...@infosys.com wrote:
Hi,
We are using ManifoldCF to crawl using window share repository
You have to run ./initialize.sh on the MCF 1.8 codebase for the upgrade to
take place.
Karl
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Kamil Żyta kamil.z...@pwr.edu.pl wrote:
With release-1.8-branch is the same problem.
K
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 06:47:12AM -0500, Karl Wright wrote:
Hi Kamil
Hi Smitha,
The support for folder security was added in MCF 1.6. See CONNECTORS-886.
Karl
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 6:49 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Smitha,
Can you tell me what version of MCF you are using? There was a fix for
this very situation made a while ago, if I
, 2014 at 08:00:12AM -0500, Karl Wright wrote:
You have to run ./initialize.sh on the MCF 1.8 codebase for the upgrade
to
take place.
Karl
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Kamil Żyta kamil.z...@pwr.edu.pl
wrote:
With release-1.8-branch is the same problem.
K
On Mon
=org.apache.manifoldcf.crawler.connectors.sharedrive.SharedDriveConnector/
(...)
K
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 08:39:07AM -0500, Karl Wright wrote:
Hi Kamil,
What does connectors-proprietary.xml say about the jcifs connector?
Karl
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Kamil Żyta kamil.z...@pwr.edu.pl
wrote:
Right
Regards,
Smitha S
*From:* Karl Wright [mailto:daddy...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Monday, December 15, 2014 6:40 PM
*To:* user@manifoldcf.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: User permission for crawling windows share
Hi Smitha,
The support for folder security was added in MCF 1.6. See CONNECTORS-886
Hi Aeham,
Before you assume that stuffing is just not happening fast enough, you will
want to confirm that you have enough documents that are *eligible* for
processing. In a continuous job, documents may well be scheduled to be
crawled at some time in the future, and are ineligible for crawling
FWIW, you can diagnose a slow stuffer query by getting a thread dump. If
there are tons of idle worker threads AND your stuffer thread is waiting on
Postgresql, that's a good sign it is not keeping up due to database reasons.
Karl
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 7:23 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
Hi Kamil,
You are getting a 404 error when ManifoldCF tries to delete a document from
the ElasticSearch index:
else if (code == 404)
{
setResult(IOutputHistoryActivity.HTTP_ERROR,Result.ERROR, Page not
found: + response);
throw new ManifoldCFException(Server/page not
Yes, I believe it is.
Karl
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Aeham Abushwashi
aeham.abushwa...@exonar.com wrote:
Thanks Karl.
I see that JobManager#fetchAndProcessDocuments invokes
database.beginTransaction soon after acquiring the lock. Is that
transaction necessary?
If you share a local folder, you should be able to use the Windows
Share/DFS Repository Connector to crawl it, yes.
Karl
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 5:23 AM, Jitu abj...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to share my local folder and crawl using Windows Share/DFS
Repository Connection. Is it
is never succeeding. i tried localhost, 127.0.0.1, ip address
etc., in server.
Thanks,
Jitu
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
If you share a local folder, you should be able to use the Windows
Share/DFS Repository Connector to crawl it, yes.
Karl
Hi Jitu,
Did you use the fully-qualified domain name of the machine?
Karl
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Jitu abj...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Karl,
Even that din't work.
Thanks,
Jitu
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 6:19 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jitu,
You would need to use
not able to
connect. please advice
Thanks,
Jitu
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jitu,
Did you use the fully-qualified domain name of the machine?
Karl
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Jitu abj...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Karl,
Even that din't work
Hi Babita,
How you use continuous crawling depends on what you are trying to
accomplish with it. In the continuous crawling model, ManifoldCF requeues
documents after it crawls them, and checks them again after an interval
that is determined in part by how often they've changed in the past. The
Hi Joel,
A SQL exception winds up throwing a ManifoldCFException in the JDBC
connectors, as follows:
if (thr instanceof java.sql.SQLException)
throw new ManifoldCFException(Exception doing connector query
'+query+': +thr.getMessage(),thr);
This is thrown up the stack through
joelkempi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Karl,
Thanks for your help and quick response. I see the logs under my
Tomcat/bin/logs.
Thanks,
Joel
Joel Kempista
(302) 858-0731
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Joel,
A SQL exception winds up throwing
Hi Dan,
The JDBC connector pulls content from a column in a database table. It
does not fetch the contents of any URLs.
The use case you are describing sounds most similar to the RSS connector.
Karl
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Dan Davis dansm...@gmail.com wrote:
I've seen the online
Hi Markus,
I've created a ticket for the exception. CONNECTORS-1114.
As for removal of a primary document that is not mentioned, do you mean
that within processDocuments(), if you don't call any disposition method
for a primary document, then that document is left around? If so, that
behavior
changes.
Karl
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 4:46 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Markus,
I've created a ticket for the exception. CONNECTORS-1114.
As for removal of a primary document that is not mentioned, do you mean
that within processDocuments(), if you don't call any
obviously didn't
actually use it, and although I'd intended to write a test, that did not
get done.
Thanks,
Karl
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 5:03 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe I've found the problem with removeDocument(), and will commit a
fix shortly.
To clarify your
Hi Arcadius,
Did you determine that that was the problem with CONNECTORS-1113?
The issue with cookies that change the experience of a user is very
complex, because it usually means that there's some sequence of pages that
get fetched which you DON'T want to index, that are involved in setting
Hi Markus,
noDocument() removes the document or the specified component from the
output but keeps track of the version in the status queue. The decision of
not indexing the document/component is considered persistent as long as the
version string does not change.
deleteDocument() removes the
See CONNECTORS-1115. I looked into this; looked relatively easy to add a
method to IProcessActivity that does what you request. Please give it a
try and let me know how it works for you.
Thanks,
Karl
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Markus
Hi Alejandro,
To do this in ManifoldCF, you could in theory write a transformation
connector that would decorate documents with security information and
metadata from a database. I haven't heard of anyone who has written such a
transformation connector yet, so you may need to develop this
Hi Markus,
Your example looks correct. I suspect there may be a bug. I'll open a
ticket. CONNECTORS-1110.
Karl
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 7:59 AM, Markus Schuch markus_sch...@web.de wrote:
Hi,
is there any example implementation of the new document component feature
invented with
Hi Markus,
You can mix and match, yes. The non-component version of the method is
equivalent to using a component ID of null.
I've created CONNECTORS- for the cleanup issue.
Thanks,
Karl
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Markus Schuch markus_sch...@web.de wrote:
Hi Karl,
as i already
Hi Alejandro,
There is no reason why that would not work.
Karl
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Alejandro Calbazana acalbaz...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
Quick question... Is it possible to associate my job's access token query
with a different data source? I have data sitting in two data
TOKEN:authGroup:A127839-1411291
AUTHORIZED:authConn2
TOKEN:authGroup:A127839-1411291
TOKEN:authGroup:A127839-1413366
TOKEN:authGroup:A127839-1413038
It doesn't even matter if the auth connectors are placed in separate
groups.
Thanks,
Alejandro
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Karl Wright daddy
TOKEN:authGroup:2
AUTHORIZED:authConn1
TOKEN:authGroup:1
Thanks,
Alejandro
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Alejandro,
I'm having a bit of trouble from your email figuring out what your
authorities are each doing.
Within an authority group
Hi Alejandro,
This is a problem with JDBC authority caching. See CONNECTORS-1109. I'll
have a fix available shortly.
Karl
Karl
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Alejandro,
This is a problem with JDBC authority caching. See CONNECTORS-1109. I'll
have a fix available shortly.
Karl
with this.
Alejandro
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
A fix is available and is attached to the ticket. Alternatively, you can
check out the dev_1x branch or trunk. Please be aware that the schema for
dev_1x and trunk has changed, so unless you are using
][org.apache.manifoldcf.db ] Requested
query: [SELECT id FROM jobs WHERE status IN (?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?)]
Thanks,
Jitu
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
I looked at this in more detail; the problem is a dangling state in the
framework. I should have a patch shortly
and there is no guarantee that it can be applied on the 1.7 branch.
Thanks,
Karl
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 6:14 AM, Jitu abj...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Karl,
Yes its windows proxy with authentication.
Thanks,
Jitu
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
I've created
Hi Kamil,
I really don't know the failure modes of postgresql when it runs out of
disk space. But if transactional integrity is maintained, it should be
sufficient to shut down all agents processes and start them back up.
Karl
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 4:24 AM, Kamil Żyta kamil.z...@pwr.edu.pl
If you are using zookeeper, you may also want to purge the zookeeper disk
area as well, before starting any MCF processes.
Karl
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 6:19 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Kamil,
I really don't know the failure modes of postgresql when it runs out of
disk
Please let me know if you were able to get past this. MCF's database
states are quite resilient, so I'd be interested to see what kinds of
problems you have.
Karl
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 6:21 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
If you are using zookeeper, you may also want to purge
Hi Kambiz,
What version of MCF are you using? In 1.7, the file system connector sets
the RepositoryDocument's modifiedDate field, which the solr output
connector formats as iso 8601 format:
if ( modifiedDateAttributeName != null )
{
Date date = document.getModifiedDate();
/Indexing_test1.doc
(1485122413007994880)]} 0 15
I see that URL Mapping tab in the job created based on Windows share
repository.
by the way, How the request should be created?
Regards
Kambiz
--
*From:* Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
*To:* user
to do declare fields for created date and modified date attributes and
which fields contains the value for created date and modified date in
addition to createdOn and lastModified fields. Can you advise?
Regards
Kambiz
--
*From:* Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com
I've attached a patch. The ticket was already resolved in the dev_1x
branch.
Thanks,
Karl
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Michael,
You are correct. See CONNECTORS-1107. I will be attaching a patch
shortly.
Karl
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 3:52
())
.setDefaultSocketConfig(SocketConfig.custom()
.setTcpNoDelay(true)
.setSoTimeout(socketTimeout)
.build())
.setDefaultCredentialsProvider(credentialsProvider);
Thanks,
Jitu
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jitu,
There are tons of different ways
but that
requires a new release of HttpClient to properly be implemented.)
Thanks,
Karl
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 6:09 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jitu,
Is this a Windows proxy? Is it an authenticated proxy?
Karl
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:07 AM, Jitu abj...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Karl
I am pleased to announce that Apache ManifoldCF 1.7.2 has been released.
This bug fix release addresses mainly performance and scaling-related
issues.
Thanks,
Karl
Hi Kambiz,
There are a number of possibilities. I'll list them in order of likelihood.
(1) The Meridio API might have changed, so that the WSDLs and XSDs we
compile against might need to be updated. What version of Meridio are you
working with?
(2) It's possible that the plugin would need to
AS lcf__id FROM
crawltest; arguments = ()
OK 0 1
What are you doing that differs in any significant way from this? For
example, are you supplying a version query, or not?
Thanks,
Karl
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Alejandro,
Is there anything
--
*From:* Kambiz Niktabar nikta...@yahoo.com
*To:* Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com; user@manifoldcf.apache.org
user@manifoldcf.apache.org
*Sent:* Tuesday, October 28, 2014 10:24 PM
*Subject:* Re: Two Active directory connections in Authority group
Hi Karl,
Thanks a lot
Hi Jitu,
There is no way in the current API to know this.
Karl
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 4:09 AM, Jitu abj...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Karl,
Thanks for your continued support. Inside output connector's
addOrReplaceDocumentWithException method is there a way to find if its new
or update of
for access tokens in the database? a
joined table, or a delimiter-separated list?
A joined table would be preferable.
Thanks,
Alejandro
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Alejandro,
The reason you are confused about document security in JDBC is because
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Alejandro,
I've completed development of this feature. Remember that this work is
currently based on unreleased MCF 2.0 code, so you will want to try it out
in a way that does not impact any existing instances of MCF
Hi Arcadius,
Yes, if you write an appropriate connector, MCF can crawl JSON and write
each entity as a component of the document. You would need a distinct URL
each component, and a component identifier, but that is pretty much all.
Karl
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Arcadius Ahouansou
Hi Alejandro,
The reason you are confused about document security in JDBC is because,
heretofore, nobody has implemented document security using JDBC. We've
been waiting for quite a while for a user who needs this functionality, so
that we develop it properly.
If you are hoping to get security
Hi Minhui,
ManifoldCF is not designed to somehow know about external changes you have
made to an index outside of ManifoldCF. It updates entire documents, using
delete/insert. If you want to manage other fields, I suggest that the best
way to do it is to write a transformation connector that
Ok, I see now how it's supposed to work.
See CONNECTORS-1088.
Karl
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 3:42 AM, Arcadius Ahouansou arcad...@menelic.com
wrote:
Hello Karl.
On 23 October 2014 17:57, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Looking at the SOLR patch, I have two concerns. First, here's
documents from the associated authority group.
Thanks,
Karl
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Kambiz,
The Active Directory authority is not an additive authority, so you
cannot use it within the same authorization group with other authorities,
and expect
Hi Ethan,
This does not sound like it is related in any way to the google drive
connection, unless for some reason the google API is considering some of
the documents fetched to have only metadata and no content. In this case,
you'd see size of zero in the simple history for indexing activity
On Oct 27, 2014, at 2:27 PM, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ethan,
This does not sound like it is related in any way to the google drive
connection, unless for some reason the google API is considering some of
the documents fetched to have only metadata and no content
Hi Aeham,
Here are the svn revs involved:
r1626105 | kwright | 2014-09-18 19:42:24 -0400 (Thu, 18 Sep 2014) | 1 line
Pull up fix for CONNECTORS-1038 from dev_1x branch
Hi Aeham,
Other fixes in 1.7.1 fixed this particular problem, I believe.
Karl
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Aeham Abushwashi
aeham.abushwa...@exonar.com wrote:
All relevant patches from 1.7.x have been applied (to our internal 1.6.1
branch), including changes to files bundled in the
Hi Markus,
I would suggest creating a class that extends DBInterfaceMySQL; call it
DBInterfaceMariaDB. Change only those methods that select the database
driver. You can then see if everything works; just change your
properties.xml file to point at your new class.
FWIW, LGPL is not compatible
Looking at the SOLR patch, I have two concerns. First, here's the
pertinent part of the patch:
+ boilerpipe = de.l3s.boilerpipe.extractors. + boilerpipe;
+ try {
+ClassLoader loader =
BoilerpipeExtractor.class.getClassLoader();
+Class extractorClass =
Hi Aeham,
You should apply all patches that affect ZooKeeperConnection.java.
Karl
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:45 PM, Aeham Abushwashi
aeham.abushwa...@exonar.com wrote:
Hi,
I wasn't sure whether to continue the conversation on this thread or start
a new one in the dev list, so if this is
, Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Luca,
There is a solr setting which configures Solr Cell to ignore tika
errors. I don't remember what it is offhand, but you will want to set it
properly to disable tika errors.
Thanks,
Karl
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Basso Luca
have 'Transformation Connections' where I added Tika extractor.
How this works? It's only metadata extraction or mime detection?
If manifoldCF had complete Tika extraction it would had better handle Tika
errors.
Regards,
KŻ
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 06:15:52AM -0400, Karl Wright wrote:
Hi
:16PM -0400, Karl Wright wrote:
Well, that's clear enough:
ERROR - 2014-10-20 10:54:00.355; org.apache.solr.common.SolrException;
null:java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Requested
array size exceeds VM limit
OutOfMemoryExceptions are never fully
Hi Marcus,
The schema changes are handled automatically by ManifoldCF, so you do not
need to start with a clean database. All you have to do is run either the
new single-process example (or combined war), or the initialize.bat
script (for multiprocess deployments) after configuring
Unless you want to turn security off, you have to use a user with
sufficient rights to obtain share security for a file. It's up to you how
you manage that, but there is no other way.
Thanks,
Karl
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Jan Kossow j.kos...@desma.de wrote:
Hi Karl,
thanks for
901 - 1000 of 1521 matches
Mail list logo
