Re: DidMCF 2.12 change the JSON API response format?

2019-01-17 Thread James Thomas
Thanks for the information, Karl. I have a couple more questions: It looks like the format is being applied in cases where ordering might not really matter, e.g. listing jobs as in the example I gave. (Or perhaps order does matter here?) Is there any more doc on the non-sugared format than

Re: DidMCF 2.12 change the JSON API response format?

2019-01-17 Thread Karl Wright
The output format did change, and the reason was because the "syntactic sugar" format would not preserve ordering, so that if you output and re-input, you'd lose information. The more complex form is being used only where there is a possibility of ordering confusion. It was always accepted as

DidMCF 2.12 change the JSON API response format?

2019-01-16 Thread James Thomas
Hi, After installing MCF 2.12 I am seeing a change in the JSON response format from the REST API. Here's an example, from the URL mcf-api-service/json/jobs. I've isolated a job which exists in both my 2.11 and 2.12 instances. 2.11 is on the left: The 2.12 format feels "internal" and I