Re: Another Elasticsearch patch to allow the long URI

2021-03-02 Thread Shirai Takashi/ 白井隆
Hi, Karl. Karl Wright wrote: >Backwards compatibility means that we very likely have to >use the hash approach, and not use the decoding approach. Do you object to the decoding? It may be useless for the users with the alphabetical language. But it's useful for the users with the multibyte

Re: Another Elasticsearch patch to allow the long URI

2021-03-02 Thread Karl Wright
Hi - this is very helpful. I would like you to officially create a ticket in Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira , project "CONNECTORS", and attach these patches. Backwards compatibility means that we very likely have to use the hash approach, and not use the decoding approach. Thanks, Karl

Re: Another Elasticsearch patch to allow the long URI

2021-03-02 Thread Jörn Franke
Makes sense > Am 02.03.2021 um 08:33 schrieb Shirai Takashi/ 白井隆 : > > Hi, Jorn. > > Jörn Franke wrote: >> Maybe use SHA-256 or later. SHA-1 is obsolete and one never knows when it >> will be removed from JDK. > > SHA-1 is used in the ManifoldCF existent class. >