Awesome. Great to see this!
Looking forward to the blog post on how this helped utilization in
production :P
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Erb, Stephan
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
>
>
> we are happy to announce that we have open sourced two simple
> threshold-based
Apache Aurora provides Multi tenancy and Quota's
http://aurora.apache.org/
http://aurora.apache.org/documentation/latest/features/multitenancy/
On 9/19/16 5:32 PM, haosdent wrote:
There is a topic about this in MesosCon EU.
Hi everyone,
we are happy to announce that we have open sourced two simple threshold-based
oversubscription modules for Mesos. We use them for CPU and memory
oversubscription and have them running in production.
https://github.com/blue-yonder/mesos-threshold-oversubscription
The
+1, good info - wrong forum.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Zameer Manji wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Have you considered sending this to your framework's mailing list? As a
> Mesos user, I don't think framework specific documents like this need to be
> shared with the entire
Hey,
Have you considered sending this to your framework's mailing list? As a
Mesos user, I don't think framework specific documents like this need to be
shared with the entire community.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 2:59 AM, James DeFelice
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> First of
Kant,
we would love to walk new community members through the code! We understand
how important it is to have a more experienced member of the community to
help out with patches, hence we have "shepherds". Moreover, though
technically possible, is not advised to start working without having
Hi folks,
First of all the Marathon team would like to thank those who provided
feedback on the v3 API proposal (linked below) that was circulated last
month. Developing a new API for Marathon is a big undertaking and getting
your feedback early in the process has been helpful.
"A vision for
Thanks for the clarification – I’ll try to dig into this and use execute.cpp
as a starting point for my problem…
Kind Regards,
Hubert
From: Guangya Liu [mailto:gyliu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Mittwoch, 21. September 2016 09:19
To: user@mesos.apache.org
Cc: dev; Vinod Kone
Subject: Re: Support for
The answer is No, the taskGroup can be treated as Pod in Kubernetes, it
will be a set of containers co-located and co-managed on an agent that
share some resources (e.g., network namespace, volumes). For your case, you
may want to split your 50 tasks to small task groups.
Also the `execute` cli
9 matches
Mail list logo