> On Jun 21, 2017, at 10:16 AM, Megha Sharma <mshar...@apple.com> wrote: > > Thank you all for the feedback. > To summarize, not killing tasks for non-Partition Aware frameworks will make > the schedulers see a higher volume of non terminal updates for tasks for > which they have already received a TASK_LOST but nothing new that they are > not seeing today. So, this shouldn’t be a breaking change for frameworks and > this will make the partition awareness logic simpler. I will update > MESOS-7215 with the details once the design is ready.
What happens for short-lived frameworks? That is, the lost task comes back, causing the master to track its framework as disconnected, but the framework is gone and will never return. J
