Re: Volume ownership and permission

> On Apr 26, 2018, at 7:25 PM, Qian Zhang wrote: > > Hi James, > > Thanks for your comment! > > I think you are talking about the SANDBOX_PATH volume ownership issue > mentioned in the design doc >

Re: Volume ownership and permission

Hi James, Thanks for your comment! I think you are talking about the SANDBOX_PATH volume ownership issue mentioned in the design doc , IIUC, you prefer to leaving it to framework, i.e.,

Re: Questions about secret handling in Mesos

We do direct protobuf to JSON conversion for our API endpoints and I don't think we do any special case logic for `Secret` type in that conversion. So `value` based secrets will have their value show up in v1 (and likely v0) API endpoints. On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 9:25 AM, Zhitao Li

Re: Volume ownership and permission

I commented on the doc, but at least some of the issues raised there I would not regard as issues. Rather, they are about setting expectations correctly and ensuring that we are documenting (and maybe enforcing) sensible behavior. I'm not that keen on Mesos automatically "fixing" filesystem