On Oct 23, 2007 2:51 PM, Henrik Dohlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Okay, I have something that works now J
>
>
>
> Just to summarize:
>
> I use proguard to obfuscate a bunch of jars together..
>
> I use keytool to generate a test keystore and a test key.
>
> I use antrun to execute signj
Okay, I have something that works now J
Just to summarize:
I use proguard to obfuscate a bunch of jars together..
I use keytool to generate a test keystore and a test key.
I use antrun to execute signjar on all the obfuscated jars with the test key.
I use webstart to pull in the other deps
It would probably be the best to obfuscate each jar separately and get the
profile thingy working.
But: We have a lot of internal APIs between core and a handful of other jars
that we also want to be obfuscated. This is possible by pouring them all into
proguard at the same time and specifying
22/10/2007 12:01
Please respond to
user@mojo.codehaus.org
To
cc
Subject
RE: [mojo-user] Use webstart plugin with proguard
Just tried the jnlp-download-servlet and can confirm the same problem with
signing only happening on the transitive dependencies that are pulled in
and NOT on the freshly o
Just tried the jnlp-download-servlet and can confirm the same problem with
signing only happening on the transitive dependencies that are pulled in and
NOT on the freshly obfuscated jars.
Regards,
/Henrik
From: Kevin Stembridge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22. oktober 2007 11:51
C
one I use.
Cheers,
Kevin
"Henrik Dohlmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
22/10/2007 10:24
Please respond to
user@mojo.codehaus.org
To
cc
Subject
RE: [mojo-user] Use webstart plugin with proguard
Okay, I have now experimented with obfuscating all the needed jars first,
du
Okay, I have now experimented with obfuscating all the needed jars first,
dumping them into target and running jnlp-inline after. Unfortunately, that
does not work. The webstart plugin ignores all the obfuscated jars and just use
the non-obfuscated ones from the repository instead? What am I doi
"Henrik Dohlmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
19/10/2007 13:12
Please respond to
user@mojo.codehaus.org
To
cc
Subject
RE: [mojo-user] Use webstart plugin with proguard
Adding my final question first, in the hope that is it not overlooked?
I am thinking about just obfuscat
Adding my final question first, in the hope that is it not overlooked…
I am thinking about just obfuscating all the dependencies when I create a jnlp.
Having just recently switched to 1.0-alpha-2, I don’t know if this is feasible?
Can I gather all the dependencies with the dependencies or assemb
.
I often use provided scope to avoid these sorts of transitive dependency
problems, not just with the webstart plugin.
Cheers,
Kevin
"Henrik Dohlmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
19/10/2007 09:42
Please respond to
user@mojo.codehaus.org
To
cc
Subject
RE: [mojo-user] Use
On 10/18/07, Kevin Stembridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Jerome,
> I thought about that at the time I was writing the example APT, but from the
> point of view of the webstart plugin there is no connection with proguard or
> the process of obfuscation. The obfuscated jar is treated as just
FAQ because I'm sure the
question will come up again.
"Jerome Lacoste" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
18/10/2007 14:07
Please respond to
user@mojo.codehaus.org
To
user@mojo.codehaus.org
cc
Subject
Re: [mojo-user] Use webstart plugin with proguard
On 10/18/07, Kevin Stembri
Thanks for the pointer to the snapshot repository J
A difference that I may have is that my project consists of multiple maven jar
projects, where more than one of them depends on some of the others.
For example, a client and a connector that both depends upon a core, but not on
each other.
On 10/18/07, Kevin Stembridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Henrik,
> I'm pretty sure the snapshot is available in the codehaus snapshot
> repository. If so, you don't need to compile it yourself. Just add the
> following to your pom.xml.
>
>
> Codehaus Snapshots
>
gt;
18/10/2007 13:13
Please respond to
user@mojo.codehaus.org
To
cc
Subject
RE: [mojo-user] Use webstart plugin with proguard
This could very well be an option for me J
I just recently got the 1.0-alpha2-SNAPSHOT compiled and installed
locally, by skipping tests. I think this is the reaso
This could very well be an option for me J
I just recently got the 1.0-alpha2-SNAPSHOT compiled and installed locally, by
skipping tests. I think this is the reason since I am on a windows box:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-117
So, having compiled the 1.0-alpha2-SNAPSHOT, I assume
r and serving it up
via Sun's JnlpDownloadServlet.
If this is an option for you I can give you more information if you'd
like.
Cheers,
Kevin
"Henrik Dohlmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
18/10/2007 10:32
Please respond to
user@mojo.codehaus.org
To
cc
Subject
[mojo
The following is working:
* Use webstart plugin to produce a zip with all needed jars and a jnlp file.
Now, I would like to do the same with jars that have been obfuscated with
proguard.
I have tried the following:
* Install the obfuscated jars with a classifier alongside the normal jars.
* Manua
18 matches
Mail list logo
