Re: Nested fields in form-widgets

strikes me that the tree would be a way, maybe not as clean. = BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation Specialtymarket.com

Nested fields in form-widgets

Hi all, I'm trying (with my team) to build a new eCommerce webapp using OFBiz, and we're stuck with form-widgets, so here's the problem : - Need : I have two related tables (many to many), Items and their categories, I need to display Items for each category a part using form-widgets. So definit

Re: Regarding Entity

This is for older versions, now use rather https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Mini-Language+Guide Jacques From: "Naveen Kumar" Hi Shubham, Thanks for your support. Regards, Naveen. On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Shubham Dubey < shubham.du...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote: Hi

Re: Regarding Entity

Hi Shubham, Thanks for your support. Regards, Naveen. On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Shubham Dubey < shubham.du...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote: > Hi Naveen > > You can also see : http://ofbiz.apache.org/docs/minilang.html > > > Thanks $ Regards > Shubham Dubey > HotwaxMedia > > > > > Naveen Kum

Re: groovy screen widget

Hi Varun, But I don't understand why you don't just create the entity condition in the groovy file: isVirtualCondition = org.ofbiz.entity.condition.EntityCondition.makeCondition("isVirtual", "Y") Why try and create a condition in the screen widget when it is easier to do it in the groovy file

Re: groovy screen widget

Hi Scott, I have already put the groovy part in a .groovy file, though just wanted to know if i had missed something. Thanks again. On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 12:56 PM, varun bhansaly wrote: > Hi Atul, > Thanks for ur reply. > I had already tried that with type = "Object", it still does not work, >

Re: groovy screen widget

Hi Atul, Thanks for ur reply. I had already tried that with type = "Object", it still does not work, still seen as instanceof String. Hi Scott, There are no asterisks, for the post i had replaced " with ". On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Atul Vani wrote: > hi Varun, > > try using 'type' attri