Thanks a lot Sasha!
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Sascha Rodekamp wrote:
> Hi Jonatan,
> you can't put label tags in js files, because they are interpreted by the
> freemarker parser, which don't parse js files.
>
> Some month ago, i created a JS function which can resolve ui Label tags.
> Yo
I know various people have expressed interest in Maven over the years. From a
quick search I see such discussions going back to 2003!
OFBiz would definitely benefit from more modularization, and Maven may be able
to help with that. However, it is just a tool and would still require
significant
I heard a rumor that Tata (TCS) has an ecommerce system that is based on OFBiz,
though with re-written ecommerce and catalog/etc management applications.
Has anyone heard of this, or even better... is anyone involved with this effort
at TCS or perhaps using it in their company or for a client?
Hi,
One other point: this tool is currently useful against ofbiz "as-is", in order
to build software that depends on it, using maven. Converting ofbiz to use
maven is a considerably bigger project.
On 13 Jul 2011, at 15:01, David E Jones wrote:
>
> I know various people have expressed intere
Is part of the intent to use the Maven release plugin for deployment and such
as well?
-David
On Jul 13, 2011, at 3:12 PM, Eric Bowman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One other point: this tool is currently useful against ofbiz "as-is", in
> order to build software that depends on it, using maven. Conver
Hy,
The same sound of a French customer which deployed a huge ecommerce with
TATA and the ATG system. But I do not have more information...
Pierre
On 13/07/2011 15:07, David E Jones wrote:
I heard a rumor that Tata (TCS) has an ecommerce system that is based on OFBiz,
though with re-written
Yes. We version our changes of ofbiz in a mavenesque way, and intend to use
the maven release plugin to generate releases which get "deployed" (in maven
terminology) to a repository, from which they get deployed to real servers.
On 13 Jul 2011, at 15:18, David E Jones wrote:
>
> Is part of th
Ready, and is running well in SQL Server 2008 R2, I just need to raise test
data, thus giving the error because the database did not contain any records
in its tables.
I ran the following command: ant run-install; and then: startofbiz.bat.
Thanks,
Rafael
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Rafae
This is an interesting idea, and there seem to be a number of plugins for Maven
that deal with release/build/deploy automation.
Looking around to learn more about this I found this interesting intro
presentation that talks about the Maven release plugin, plus plugins for other
tools like Codeh
Hi David, hi Eric,
first: cool tool Eric would love to see it!
I worked a lot with maven in the last year and must say it is pretty amazing
how easy thinks can be when you follow the convention over configuration
pattern. There are plenty of plugins which support you by
building/deploying/organiz
google
ofbiz reconciliation
you will get some jira issues about it.
there is help on each page.
you can also see the complete doc available by using
http://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/cmssite/cms/APACHE_OFBIZ_HTML
then do a find in the browser for the what you looking for. does not
always work but
Hello Everyone,
I have an ofbiz instance in production where none of the jobs are
being performed. I have about 160K jobs in pending status, but they
are never being schedule.
I can see the following in the log:
2011-07-13 13:32:01,959 (org.ofbiz.service.job.JobPoller@2599930b) [
JobManager.java:
the key is Transaction timeout
this could be the job length
could be the database connection
please specify the version of ofbiz since earlier transaction problems
were taken care of by changing code that deals with transactions.
Josh Jacobson sent the following on 7/13/2011 11:48 AM:
> Hello Ev
Josh,
I've also seen this problem if the JobSandbox table has too many rows to
process. I ran into a similar problem when I tried to run 10,000 Async
batch processes. The time it took for the JobPoller to process all the
records was too long and the transaction would time out.
I had a patch to
BJ,
I am running 10.04.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:00 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
> the key is Transaction timeout
> this could be the job length
> could be the database connection
>
> please specify the version of ofbiz since earlier transaction problems
> were taken care of by changing code that de
Brett,
Can you please explain what you mean by archiving the current JobSandbox first?
Do you mean somehow removing the current pending jobs, applying you
patch and the copying them back again?
Thanks,
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Brett Palmer wrote:
> Josh,
>
> I've also seen this proble
Ok so you have the latest code.
what is the eviorment you working with.
OS
Memory
CPU speed
Josh Jacobson sent the following on 7/13/2011 12:12 PM:
> BJ,
>
> I am running 10.04.
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:00 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
>> the key is Transaction timeout
>> this could be the job l
I meant removing finished jobs. If you have thousands of pending jobs then
you will have the same problem I mentioned in my first email. One
resolution will be to increase the job poller transaction time. In the
ofbiz version I was using there was not a way to configure the poller
transaction ti
Currently I am running:
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.5
6 CPUs, 16384MB RAM
It was very recently upgraded from 2 CPUs and 8GB of RAM because we
were having performance issues (lots of swap memory being used). It's
on one of those cloud servers. Now it's running without using any
swap.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Brett Palmer wrote:
> I meant removing finished jobs. If you have thousands of pending jobs then
> you will have the same problem I mentioned in my first email. One
> resolution will be to increase the job poller transaction time. In the
> ofbiz version I was u
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Josh Jacobson
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Brett Palmer wrote:
>> I meant removing finished jobs. If you have thousands of pending jobs then
>> you will have the same problem I mentioned in my first email. One
>> resolution will be to increase the
You now know why I don't recommend cloud configuration for realtime
operations, unless your running over dedicate lines not part of the
internet.
to summarize you environment caused the problem not ofbiz
Now you have jobs cued that should have been run but have piled up.
you need a way to get the j
Thanks for the pointers. I'll take a look.
There is one more piece of information: The purgeOldJobs service is in
a "crashed" status. Do you think that is significant?
Thanks,
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 4:32 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
> You now know why I don't recommend cloud configuration for realtim
it means it will not purge job done so you will get a build up
you can do a run service to start it again
Josh Jacobson sent the following on 7/13/2011 4:41 PM:
> Thanks for the pointers. I'll take a look.
>
> There is one more piece of information: The purgeOldJobs service is in
> a "crashed" s
Thanks, that is what I figured. First things first though: I need to
get those jobs running somehow.
Thanks for the help.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 4:46 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
> it means it will not purge job done so you will get a build up
> you can do a run service to start it again
>
>
> Josh Ja
Brett,
Before I start trying to run the jobs manually, I want to give your
suggestion a try. I think I know where to configure the job polling
transaction time (I believe it's the poll-db-millis="2" value on
the framework/service/config/serviceengine.xml.
However, I still don't know what to i
That configuration is for the frequency of job polls. There isn't any ability
to specify the transaction timeout via configuration so you'll need to modify
the code directly:
JobManager.java (line 148):
beganTransaction = TransactionUtil.begin();
needs to be changed to use TransactionUtil.begin(
Scott,
Thanks! That is very precise advise. Do you have a suggestion on
interval time? 60 seconds? 120?
Thanks,
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
> That configuration is for the frequency of job polls. There isn't any
> ability to specify the transaction timeout via configura
As best I can tell there shouldn't be any need to increase the interval between
polls since the interval timer doesn't actually start until the previous poll
has completed (see JobPoller.run()) so I can't see how a small interval would
cause any backlog problems.
I'm guessing if there is any lo
Thanks again. I actually meant a suggestion for the transaction
timeout. In any case I am grateful for your explanation.
On Wednesday, July 13, 2011, Scott Gray wrote:
> As best I can tell there shouldn't be any need to increase the interval
> between polls since the interval timer doesn't actu
Ah okay, that is entirely dependent on the number of jobs and the speed the
server can process them. As a side note I would keep a close eye on the
purgeOldJobs service, when it starts falling over (transaction timeout again)
then the number of rows in the table will increase quickly which in t
Josh,
I'm attaching the patch I used to work around this issue. This is based on
an older version of ofbiz so I would compare your current files carefully.
The following files were patched:
service-config.xsd
serviceengine.xml
JobManager.java
JobPoller.java
The patch allowed for a new confi
I tried 60 seconds for timeout but that didn't work. I guess Ill
double it now and keep trying.
I have about 260,000 pending jobs, and nothing is getting done.
I know what you mean about purgeOldjobs. That service is crashed now
and I deleted old jobs from the database by hand. I was up to 2.6
mi
Yes, that's the point, I strong recommend migrate the build system to
maven, it's very handy to build/development/deploy/release with maven
since there is lots of plugins can be use, and you also can write your
plugin if possible. Just as Sascha mentioned, IMHO,
1. Maven follow the convention
Not sure what db you're using but it probably wouldn't hurt to run a vacuum on
the table to speed up processing.
By the way, I'm pretty sure the default timeout is 60 seconds so you might want
to try something a little larger :-)
Regards
Scott
On 14/07/2011, at 2:58 PM, Josh Jacobson wrote:
>
Vacuum has been run, (took quite a while). Yeah, I see now that the
JobManager actually tries to update all the JobSandbox rows in the
transaction, so 60 seconds was pretty low.
I am trying 10 minutes now and see how that goes.
I am using postgress by the way.
Thanks for the help, I really appre
I used Maven Ant Tasks in the development of new OFBiz applications.
The Maven Ant Tasks allow some of the Maven's artifact handling
features including the dependency management to be used from within
the Ant build.
So this could be an option for those who wants to use POM to manage
the dependenci
For the people who do not follow any of the below twitters:
@apache_ofbiz
@ofbiz_info
We have created two screens you can use for promotional purposes:
OFBiz end users: http://www.ofbiz.info/control/endusers
OFBiz providers: http://www.ofbiz.info/control/providers
Everybody can add himself or
you going to run into this from time to time or one reason or another.
the approach I took was to spread the jobs out so they are not lumped
together.
take a look at how the jobs are Marshalled to be run.
Josh Jacobson sent the following on 7/13/2011 8:35 PM:
> Vacuum has been run, (took quite a w
39 matches
Mail list logo
