Florian,
Just wanted share my understanding with business. When a vendor come and
share its quote with any company and company after discussion finalize some
quotation and sign an agreement. After that whenever company needs that
item it purchase as per the agreement price. Not sure why you need
a
Rishi, Florian, all,
It is fairly common in various sectors that companies have framework
agreements with their suppliers (and thus the other way around also), that
define not also the terms and conditions regarding the delivery of service
and/or goods. But also define how process flows.
So, a fr
Below is the process I have real time experience with;
1. Company A has agreement (preferred vendor agreement) including payment
terms.
Note: some companies in company B Position may request company A for credit
application.
2. Any or selected employees of Company A can request goods or serv
Naveen,
The short answer to your question, is 'yes, use OFBiz for either the
processes of companyA or the processes of company B'.
Your posting, albeit related to the generics of procurement and sale
process, seems - based on the simple processes descriptions - more complex
than can be assessed
Hi,
You may know that we are no longer supporting Ant in trunk, replaced by Gradle.
At https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7779 "Update wiki Eclipse pages regarding
Gradle", I begin to explore what "Gradle" proposes in Eclipse.
You may want to share your experience there, hopefully bet
Hi Everyone
A quick update following on from the discussions last week about the 14.12
and 15.12 branches. The final result of the community discussions were as
follows:
- There will be no more releases from 13.07 (so the current release that
is
out is the last one in that series)
- We a
Great work Sharan. Thank you for everything you've done on this. I'm glad
we have an acceptable resolution that maintains vitality while propelling
us forward.
Taher Alkhateeb
On Jul 12, 2016 5:51 PM, "Sharan-F" wrote:
> Hi Everyone
>
> A quick update following on from the discussions last week
Thanks Sharan,
I hope everybody will find this solution the better we could have with the
constraints we have
Thanks
Jacques
Le 12/07/2016 à 16:55, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit :
Great work Sharan. Thank you for everything you've done on this. I'm glad
we have an acceptable resolution that maint
Thank you for this update. Looking forward to 16.x and beyond.
On 16-07-12 07:08 AM, Sharan-F wrote:
Hi Everyone
A quick update following on from the discussions last week about the 14.12
and 15.12 branches. The final result of the community discussions were as
follows:
- There will be
Thank you for your answers !
It is exactly as Pierre said.
To my mind that it is an improvement but from what Rishi said, it may be
a specific need.
It could be nice if we could get a few more opinions about this subject.
Should I open a Jira now to launch the improvement, start to think about
Florian,
It is a good suggestion to wait and and see whether other contributors will
provide their insights and concerns before creating a improvement issue in
JIRA. As a suggestion, you could wait e.g. the standard minimum delay
period of 72h before applying lazy consensus.
And then work from th
I see no problems with the idea so creating a Jira fits for me
Jacques
Le 12/07/2016 à 18:14, Pierre Smits a écrit :
Florian,
It is a good suggestion to wait and and see whether other contributors will
provide their insights and concerns before creating a improvement issue in
JIRA. As a sugge
12 matches
Mail list logo
