Hi Mirko, I had a quick look at the code and it looks to me like the GenericRequester is used if passed in but only if the job is run in memory instead of being persisted to the database. Are you seeing something different or are you expecting that it would be serialized and stored with the job?
Regards Scott On 31 August 2016 at 21:16, Vogelsme <mirko.vogelsme...@lynx.de> wrote: > Hey! > I was just trying to run a persistent async service with a given requester > and noticed that the requester itself is completely being ignored. > I cross-checked trunk and 13/07 for that issue and both handle async > services the same way; there was no hint in javadoc about that. > There might be some ways to persist and use a stored Object/Requester > (ClassLoader, ObjectStore, ...) for the services. I was wondering if there > is a reason or conceptual issue with that. > > I know the concept of Requesters is rarely used in OFBiz, but we use it to > actively control multithreaded services. > > Greetings, > Mirko > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble. > com/Issue-using-a-GenericRequester-with-persistent-async-services- > tp4692059.html > Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
