BJ,
2009/7/17 BJ Freeman
> Where I find the problem is that these projects take more manhours than
> people envisions.
>
At this time. Do you still think this project should take a lot of work to
be done or what I've written in my last messages opened for one or two
easier, more OOTB deployment
ther scenario is you can have all the catalogs under one website and
> > they select which one. this would have one theme, which to model after
> > the real B&M Factory Outlet malls is not what they have. Each store has
> > its own look & feel.
> >
> > Leonardo Ruos
transfer to have one facility to do the shipping
> another scenario is you can have all the catalogs under one website and
> they select which one. this would have one theme, which to model after
> the real B&M Factory Outlet malls is not what they have. Each store has
> its own look &
And I do accept better names suggestions. :-)
2009/7/17 Leonardo Ruoso
> May be my last message already clarifies it, so please let me know.
>
> 2009/7/17 BJ Freeman
>
May be my last message already clarifies it, so please let me know.
2009/7/17 BJ Freeman
> You have introduced a new variable Factories
> how does that relate to the mall.
>
> Leonardo Ruoso sent the following on 7/17/2009 2:34 AM:
> > Sounds better now!
> >
> > A
em is that these projects take more manhours than
> people envisions.
>
>
> Leonardo Ruoso sent the following on 7/17/2009 2:35 AM:
> > Yes, we are the only company collecting money. There's only one website
> > also.
> >
> > 2009/7/16 BJ Freeman
>
Yes, we are the only company collecting money. There's only one website
also.
2009/7/16 BJ Freeman
> as long as you are the only company collecting money then the current
> accounting will work
>
> Leonardo Ruoso sent the following on 7/16/2009 1:07 PM:
> > I'm not
t you most of the way there.
>
> -David
>
>
>
> On Jul 16, 2009, at 2:07 PM, Leonardo Ruoso wrote:
>
> I'm not going to keep accounting for each store and will not have any
>> system
>> integration with then. All the horizontal integration will be done
&g
what is
> required for ofbiz.
> You have a mini-lan to grasp plus a head jerk from object to entity data
> storage. Also he way ofbiz displays data is totally different from using
> database driven systems.
> But it is doable.
>
>
>
> Leonardo Ruoso sent the follow
stomization.
> it would also take an instance of ofbiz running for each store, the way
> I envision it.
> there may be other ways, would have to get detailed requirements to go
> further.
>
> Leonardo Ruoso sent the following on 7/16/2009 12:45 PM:
> > I'm not sure it
The project is for a new startup company
Leonardo Ruoso
2009/7/16 David E Jones
>
> The short answer is yes.
>
> A slightly longer answer is: there is a 90% chance that 60-90% of the
> functionality you need/want will exist OOTB in OFBiz. To qualify that
> statement I should
2009/7/16 BJ Freeman
> this has been answered before so let me take different approach.
> The model was for A company and Sub-companies related to the Company
> Code can be written that allows this.
> it is not 100% OOTB though.
>
>
>
>
> Leonardo Ruoso sent the following
l the stores,
pack it and mail it to the custommer. Revenue is based on COMMISSIONS, so
we'll not resale anything.
TIA,
Leonardo Ruoso
13 matches
Mail list logo
