On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 4:00 PM, sugionodjojo sugionodj...@gmail.comwrote:
I restart my computer, and try ./startofbiz.sh
and it exactly like what i had before, it went on and went on with date,
catalina container, persistent program, etc from terminal window.
is there something wrong with
Have you started ofbiz? Please navigate to your ofbiz folder and run the
command ./startofbiz.sh (without the quotes) to start ofbiz. Wait for a
couple of minutes and then connect to localhost:8080/catalog (or any other
application).
--Venkat
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:57 PM, sugionodjojo
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Surya Kusumakar kusumakar.of...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Venkat,
For Sales order you can set your preference in Accounting Preferences field
: Order Id Prefix. So all the Sales order numbers will start with your
preferred prefix, like : BMP11 . Also you can
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Adrian Crum
adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com wrote:
You can override the createOrderHeader service with your own. Then use
separate sequence names for POs and SOs.
That is probably what I will be doing. Will create a flag and allow this to
be configured.
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:53 PM, varun bhansaly vbhans...@gmail.com wrote:
If you are storing orders in the same entity OrderHeader, then you
will have to take measures to prevent PK violations.
Here's what I had in mind.
A flag will identify if the SO and PO sequences have to be different.
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Adrian Crum
adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com wrote:
That is not necessary. Just prefix the ID with PO or SO.
Order IDs
-
SO0001
SO0002
PO0001
PO0002
...
That would work when you want a prefix. The scenario I had in mind did not
have a
MRP created a requirement for a product that already has a previously
closed requirement (closed because the requirement was used to place
order). It did not do this for all the products, but only a few. I wonder
what could have caused this inconsistency. Any thoughts?
--
Regards,
Venkat
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Integrin info.integ...@gmail.com wrote:
Requirements is based on a handful of factors including Min. Stock,
Sales Orders, Sales Forecast, Scheduled Production Run for Product
Requirements; You might want to check these
Checked all of these. Yet it failed to
Sales Order and Purchase Order have a common sequence in ofbiz. I am
assuming that this is because there are both stored in the Order table. Is
there anyway of giving them separate sequence numbers?
--
Regards,
Venkat
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Jacopo Cappellato
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
In a manufacturing setup, one cannot setup WIP as finished goods.
Did you consider to use for them the SUBASSEMBLY type rather than the WIP
type?
When I did that, it did not create production runs
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:01 AM, nadhiya
nadhiya.shanm...@icissolutions.com wrote:
Hi All,
After receiving the purchase, I had put it in the particular facility that
I
have created.
But still my Quantity on hand/Available to promise field value is empty
in
the
InventoryItemDetails
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 5:03 PM, nadhiya nadhiya.shanm...@icissolutions.com
wrote:
Thank u for your reply Venkat.
I have created a new facility named IC Warehouse, but i'm not able to
find
a field to enter the minimum quantity for a facility. In that facility i
have created a location
We have run into a funny problem running MRP. If I have 100 qty in stock
and a sales order for 200, MRP generates a manufacturing order for 200 and
not 100. Any idea why this is so?
--
Regards,
Venkat
to the productId and facilityId of the MRP?
Jacopo
On May 14, 2012, at 9:26 AM, Venkat Mangudi wrote:
We have run into a funny problem running MRP. If I have 100 qty in stock
and a sales order for 200, MRP generates a manufacturing order for 200
and
not 100. Any idea why this is so
associated to the productId and facilityId of the MRP?
Jacopo
On May 14, 2012, at 9:26 AM, Venkat Mangudi wrote:
We have run into a funny problem running MRP. If I have 100 qty in stock
and a sales order for 200, MRP generates a manufacturing order for 200
and
not 100. Any idea why this is so
Jacopo,
I think I found the offensive setting. Product Id 123`15 seems to be a WIP,
while 12811 is setup as a Raw Material. But would that cause a problem?
--Venkat
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Venkat Mangudi venkatmang...@gmail.comwrote:
Let me also look at those two... Quick question
OTOH, for WIP products, why does it not account for available stock when
creating Pending Internal requirements? Is there a setting for this?
--Venkat
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Venkat Mangudi venkatmang...@gmail.comwrote:
Jacopo,
I think I found the offensive setting. Product Id 123
by a production run and used by another one (without
passing for the warehouse).
If you don't want this behaviour you should use standard products
(finished goods or raw materials)
Jacopo
On May 14, 2012, at 11:52 AM, Venkat Mangudi wrote:
OTOH, for WIP products, why does it not account
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Arpit Singh Pandya
pandyaarpitsi...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a requirement of decoupling OFBiz Ecommerce front-end from OFBiz
ERP(Back end).
If we want to use the same OFBiz Ecommerce front end with other ERP or
Vice-Versa.
Is there any easy way to fulfill
This requirement is pretty much standard in markets where the vendor
purchases items specifically for certain customers and might never sell
that item again. My two cents would be that it might make sense to create a
separate UI to do this, but in the background call the respective services
to
20 matches
Mail list logo
