Re: OFBiz Sanity Test Automation

Team, I didn't get chance to work on it due to some other priorities. Sorry about that. Thanks. -- Sanjay Yadav Manager, Enterprise Quality Assurance *HotWax Systems* *Enterprise open source experts* cell: +91-787.918.8830 http://www.hotwaxsystems.com On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 9:53 AM Jacques Le

Re: OFBiz Sanity Test Automation

Hi all, (Re using Geb and Spock for functional testing) On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 at 14:23, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Hi Sanjay, Paul, > > What is the situation? > Nothing new from me. As you know I'm in favour of using Geb and Spock over and above Selenium, but doing any work on this is way down my

Re: OFBiz Sanity Test Automation

Hi Sanjay, Paul, What is the situation? Thanks Jacques Le 29/08/2018 à 07:24, Sanjay Yadav a écrit : Thank you for the reminder, Paul. I completely missed it due to the long gap. will check it now. Best Regards, *Sanjay Yadav* | Manager, Enterprise Quality Assurance HotWax Commerce

Re: OFBiz Sanity Test Automation

Thank you for the reminder, Paul. I completely missed it due to the long gap. will check it now. Best Regards, *Sanjay Yadav* | Manager, Enterprise Quality Assurance HotWax Commerce by HotWax Systems 80, Scheme No. 78, Indore, M.P. 452010,

Re: OFBiz Sanity Test Automation

Hi Sanjay, When we discussed this last year ( http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/OFBiz-Sanity-Test-Document-td4707889.html) you said you would check out Geb and Spock. I really think there are major productivity gains in writing tests that use logical page components. Selenium is much more

Re: OFBiz Sanity Test Automation

On 2018/08/23 09:08:46, Taher Alkhateeb wrote: > Hello, is this going to be implemented in Selenium? If yes then > perhaps we should move this discussion to dev@ to make sure we get > this right. Functional tests might be very slow and so we might need > to decide whether to include these

Re: OFBiz Sanity Test Automation

Hello, is this going to be implemented in Selenium? If yes then perhaps we should move this discussion to dev@ to make sure we get this right. Functional tests might be very slow and so we might need to decide whether to include these tests by default with the "testIntegration" task for example.

Re: OFBiz Sanity Test Automation

+1, and yes go for 17.12 + Trunk. And first pick the 17.12 as it would be stable compare to trunk, -- Rishi Solanki Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd. Direct: +91-9893287847 http://www.hotwaxsystems.com www.hotwax.co On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 2:09 PM Sanjay

Re: OFBiz Sanity Test Automation

Yes, Michael:).Thanks. Thanks, Jacques. Best Regards, *Sanjay Yadav* | Manager, Enterprise Quality Assurance HotWax Commerce by HotWax Systems 80, Scheme No. 78, Indore, M.P. 452010, India Mobile Phone: 787 918 8830 | Linkedin:

Re: OFBiz Sanity Test Automation

+1 Sanjay, as I mentioned in https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/OFBiz+Sanity+Test?focusedCommentId=71014351#comment-71014351 ;-) Regards, Michael Brohl ecomify GmbH www.ecomify.de Am 22.08.18 um 08:22 schrieb Sanjay Yadav: Hello All, I am planning to automate below sanity

Re: OFBiz Sanity Test Automation

Hi Sanjay, That sounds like a great idea. It seems to me that both trunk and stable should be the targets. A Jira seems appropriate, they are rare cases where it's not actually If needed, you could continue this thread on the dev ML Thanks Jacques Le 22/08/2018 à 08:22, Sanjay Yadav a

OFBiz Sanity Test Automation

Hello All, I am planning to automate below sanity test script. Please feel free to share your thoughts. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/OFBiz+Sanity+Test Which OFBiz version I should target? Do I need to create a JIRA ticket before starting on it? Best Regards, *Sanjay Yadav*