Thanks Paul!
Jacques
Le 08/03/2017 à 17:49, Paul Mandeltort a écrit :
We actually haven’t migrated our live setup yet - we are finishing up a few
other projects including getting some docker stuff sorted out to make our IT
headaches a lot easier.
The outage only affected the S3 service
We actually haven’t migrated our live setup yet - we are finishing up a few
other projects including getting some docker stuff sorted out to make our IT
headaches a lot easier.
The outage only affected the S3 service which is separate from RDS, and as far
as I know there was no data loss,
Hi Paul,
I just wonder, are you using Amazon RDS in production? And if so how went the
last big outage?
Thanks
Jacques
Le 17/01/2017 à 21:42, Paul Mandeltort a écrit :
Honestly, probably not. There are several HA Postgres hosts nowadays that are
very cost-effective. Amazon RDS is one, for
Dear All,
thanks for all the replies, yes, I tested it and it works. I am
deploying it now on 2 machines and my set up is like the:
server A is a VPS with OpenVPN server (this server has a Public IP)
which will be used for all people that are not local to the remote office
server B is a VM
Le 21/01/2017 à 08:58, Nicolas Malin a écrit :
Hi Bahaa, for your sequence pb like spot jacques and I thhink you already ready
the delegator prefix save your pb on all creation
||
||
Le 17/01/2017 à 17:15, Bahaa Alamood a écrit :
[...] I have a questions regarding the sync. So i
Hi Bahaa, for your sequence pb like spot jacques and I thhink you
already ready the delegator prefix save your pb on all creation
||entity-group-reader=||"main"| |entity-eca-reader=||"main"|
|||distributed-cache-clear-enabled=||"false"| |sequenced-id-prefix=||"A"||>|
BDR handles this exact scenario. It will be an excellent choice for
ofbiz. Most multi master solutions are trigger based. BDR can easily
handle the 800 tables that ofbiz has and it doesn't need a table to have a
primary key, nor does it use triggers. If two or more masters updates the
same
Honestly, probably not. There are several HA Postgres hosts nowadays that are
very cost-effective. Amazon RDS is one, for example, and just a few clicks and
boom you have a replicated fail-over Postgres instance available to you for
practically nothing. Set up good backup scheme and you have a
Hi Paul,
Thanks for the advice :), but this is not the point here. The point is
having such a solution will provide you with the clustered environment
that will make your important business data always stored in more than
one machine (I think you know how important that is) We can forget
How expensive would it be to just upgrade the office’s internet connectivity?
With my business hat on, that will almost always be MUCH cheaper than investing
in a corner case of development that the rest of the community isn’t using
anyway.
Take a look at the new generation of microwave data
The now removed POS component used a solution for similar cases. This solution still
exists and is reliable on a LAN ("less" on Internet)
You can find the documentation at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Sync+Setup+Notes+and+Example
Disclaimer: it's not very easy to
Hello All,
We have a situation that we need to have more than 2 servers of ofbiz
running, server A, B, and C. The scenario is like this
1. Server A is the main server and it is online all the time with its
own database. some people do connect to that and make changes to the
data (create,
12 matches
Mail list logo
