Re: OM on port 443 nginx

2020-05-17 Thread Maxim Solodovnik
Hello Rohit, On Sun, 17 May 2020 at 19:22, Rohit Dhamal wrote: > Hello, > As given by Tom the proxy configuration for nginx works fine. > I am yet facing a few problems and have a few queries. > The query: Whether I can now close all the other ports like 5443, 5080, > , 3478. 49152:65535 in

OM on port 443 nginx

2020-05-17 Thread Rohit Dhamal
Hello, As given by Tom the proxy configuration for nginx works fine. I am yet facing a few problems and have a few queries. The query: Whether I can now close all the other ports like 5443, 5080, , 3478. 49152:65535 in PC and Router? Earlier I had these ports opened but after a fresh forma

AW: New Features: "very fast conference" and more

2020-05-17 Thread Rohrbach, Gerald
Rene, this looks like Jitsi For Video conferencing it´s okay and simple to setup. But functionality is different than OM. Running on corporate links and firewalls seems to work fine with our subsidiaries. But with the German AVM Fritzbox router we did not got it working. There was a hard delay

Re: New Features: "very fast conference" and more

2020-05-17 Thread Maxim Solodovnik
On Sat, 16 May 2020 at 21:52, Konstantin Kuzov wrote: > The only thing Jitsi does regarding to ports in default configuration is > using nginx's APLN map feature ( > http://nginx.org/en/docs/stream/ngx_stream_ssl_preread_module.html) to > hide default stun/turn ports behind nginx https port. But