Re: Problems with installing OM 2.1 on postgresql

2013-02-10 Thread michael . wuttke
Hello Maxim, now with the Revision 1444312 (the change of the table name 'user' to 'om_user') the installation of OM succeed with postgresql. Thank you! Michael > I have changed the table name for the user, to be om_user > It should work now. > > this might be the temporary solution. We double c

Re: Problems with installing OM 2.1 on postgresql

2013-02-09 Thread Maxim Solodovnik
I have changed the table name for the user, to be om_user It should work now. this might be the temporary solution. We double check all databases before release On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 9:23 PM, wrote: > Hello, > > I tried to install the latest build of OM 2.1 > (2.1.0.r1444299-09-02-2013_0050)

Problems with installing OM 2.1 on postgresql

2013-02-09 Thread michael . wuttke
Hello, I tried to install the latest build of OM 2.1 (2.1.0.r1444299-09-02-2013_0050) on postgres (9.1) under debian wheezy. But the last five tables of the database (user, user_contact, user_data, user_level, whiteboard) where not created, not by using the red5-script for init.d nor by using the