Hi Jamie,
This looks like a bug - UNSIGNED_TIMESTAMP should have a unique sql
type. Would you mind filing a JIRA?
Thanks,
James
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote:
> Your observation that UNSIGNED_DATE and UNSIGNED_TIMESTAMP share a common
> sql type is correct, at least on the 4.
Your observation that UNSIGNED_DATE and UNSIGNED_TIMESTAMP share a common
sql type is correct, at least on the 4.2 branch and on master.
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Jamie Murray wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I am looking to find documentation on the integer representation used by
> Phoenix for i
Hello,
I am looking to find documentation on the integer representation used by
Phoenix for its data types listed here:
http://phoenix.apache.org/language/datatypes.html
Here is what I have found so far, this came from a combination of java.sql
types for the non-unsigned types and some phoenix
