Re: Kerberos and bulkload

2016-04-26 Thread Sanooj Padmakumar
Setting the below configuration in the MR made it work conf.set("hbase.coprocessor.region.classes", ""); Thanks everyone! On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Sanooj Padmakumar wrote: > Apologies if its against the convention to re-open an old discussion. > > The exception was

Re: Kerberos and bulkload

2016-04-25 Thread Sanooj Padmakumar
Apologies if its against the convention to re-open an old discussion. The exception was resolved after I added "conf.set("fs.permissions.umask-mode", "000");" as per the suggestion provided by Gabriel. However the same exception has re-surfaced again in a new kerberized cluster setup and I am

Re: Kerberos and bulkload

2015-11-18 Thread Gabriel Reid
Re-adding the user list, which I accidentally left off. On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Gabriel Reid wrote: > Yes, I believe that's correct, if you change the umask you make the > HFiles readable to all during creation. > > I believe that the alternate solutions listed

Re: Kerberos and bulkload

2015-11-17 Thread Sanooj Padmakumar
Hi Gabriel Thank you so much I set the below property and it worked now.. I hope this is the correct thing to do ? conf.set("fs.permissions.umask-mode", "000"); Thanks Again Sanooj On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:29 AM, Gabriel Reid wrote: > Hi Sanooj, > > I believe

Re: Kerberos and bulkload

2015-11-17 Thread Gabriel Reid
Hi Sanooj, Yes, I think that should do it, or you can pass that config parameter as a command line parameter. - Gabriel On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Sanooj Padmakumar wrote: > Hi Gabriel > > Thank you so much > > I set the below property and it worked now.. I hope this