@JT/Maryann:
I've submitted a pull request for fixing a test
(DerivedTableIT.testDerivedTableWithGroupBy()), which passed on Java 7
but not on Java 8.
The test was retrieving two rows from a query with no ORDER BY clause,
and assuming that they would come back in a specific order. This
happened to match the order that Java 7 returned them in, but the order
has changed in Java 8.
Test fixed by not assuming any particular order.
It may be that there are other existing tests around that are doing
something similar. Obviously anything that returns 0 rows or 1 row will
not be a problem, but any test that runs a query that returns multiple
rows, and relies on a specific return order without specifying an ORDER
BY clause, is fragile.
(It would be possible to fix by adding an ORDER BY clause instead, of
course, but that would change what's being tested, which might or might
not be acceptable.)
I also converted a field to a local variable (since it was used only in
one place), and let IntelliJ clean up the import statements. Hopefully
that's not a problem.
James
