I asked if anyone could tell me how to do a gradient fill a couple months ago.
I do not believe the API supports it yet.
-Original Message-
From: Maheshwar Jayaraman [mailto:maheshwar_...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2016 1:14 PM
To: user@poi.apache.org
Subject: Ability to set
The default is gradient fill for a data bar. I wanted it to be a solid (I think
it translates to a gradient=0 attribute). I spent enough time trying to set
this via reflection that I think I can take a stab at adding a patch for this.
I will read docs to see how to contribute and take it forward
Hi Mahesh,
thanks for taking a look, let us know if you run into problems so we can
try to help out.
Dominik.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:49 PM, Maheshwar Jayaraman <
maheshwar_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> The default is gradient fill for a data bar. I wanted it to be a solid (I
> think it transla
I have one question. Which branch should I submit the patch on? Trunk or
REL_3_11_branch?
Mahesh
On 1/26/16, 11:28 PM, "Dominik Stadler" wrote:
>Hi Mahesh,
>
>thanks for taking a look, let us know if you run into problems so we can
>try to help out.
>
>Dominik.
>
>
>On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10
On Wed, 27 Jan 2016, Maheshwar Jayaraman wrote:
I have one question. Which branch should I submit the patch on? Trunk or
REL_3_11_branch?
Trunk - we're working up to 3.14 final at the moment!
Nick
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: us
On Tue, 26 Jan 2016, Maheshwar Jayaraman wrote:
The default is gradient fill for a data bar. I wanted it to be a solid
(I think it translates to a gradient=0 attribute). I spent enough time
trying to set this via reflection that I think I can take a stab at
adding a patch for this. I will read
Nick,
Thanks for the instructions. I realize I need to make changes to the underlying
CT_DataBar class as well as that defines the actual attribute for gradient.
That is a separate library. Is there a standard process for stacking such
dependent changes across 2 libraries?
Mahesh
On 1/27/16,
On Mon, 1 Feb 2016, Maheshwar Jayaraman wrote:
Thanks for the instructions. I realize I need to make changes to the
underlying CT_DataBar class as well as that defines the actual attribute
for gradient.
That'll be a problem. The way to get a fix in that is to get ECMA and/or
ISO to update the
Interesting. The spec from 2009
(https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh656506(v=office.12).aspx) does have
the attribute but I see POI is using 2006. Is there a reason its not updated?
Mahesh
On 2/1/16, 10:35 AM, "Nick Burch" wrote:
>On Mon, 1 Feb 2016, Maheshwar Jayaraman wrote:
>> Th
Nick, Any pointers?
Mahesh
On 2/1/16, 10:55 AM, "Maheshwar Jayaraman" wrote:
>Interesting. The spec from 2009
>(https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh656506(v=office.12).aspx) does
>have the attribute but I see POI is using 2006. Is there a reason its not
>updated?
>Mahesh
>
>
>
>
>On
On Wed, 3 Feb 2016, Maheshwar Jayaraman wrote:
Interesting. The spec from 2009
(https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh656506(v=office.12).aspx)
does have the attribute but I see POI is using 2006. Is there a reason
its not updated?
Nick, Any pointers?
I've got a feeling that someone tr
11 matches
Mail list logo
