Re: Log-likelihood based correlation test?

2017-11-23 Thread Pat Ferrel
and I think I have a general idea. But I would like to have a mathematical description of the step in which the LLR comes into play. In the CCO presentations I have found it says: (PtP) compares column to column using log-likelihood based correlation test However, I have searched for &

Re: Log-likelihood based correlation test?

2017-11-22 Thread Noelia Osés Fernández
Thank you both! >>>>> >>>>> On 16 November 2017 at 16:59, Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.org> wr >>>>> ote: >>>>> >>>>>> Indeed so. Ted Dunning is an Apache Mahout PMC and committer and the >>>>>> whole

Re: Log-likelihood based correlation test?

2017-11-21 Thread Noelia Osés Fernández
t; On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Daniel Gabrieli <dgabrieli@ >>>>> salesforce.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I am pretty sure the LLR stuff in UR is based off of this blog post >>>>>> and associated paper: >>>>>&g

Re: Log-likelihood based correlation test?

2017-11-20 Thread Pat Ferrel
dence.html> Accurate Methods for the Statistics of Surprise and Coincidence by Ted Dunning http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.14.5962 <http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.14.5962> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 10:26 AM Noelia Osés Fernández <no..

Re: Log-likelihood based correlation test?

2017-11-20 Thread Daniel Gabrieli
at Ted Dunning provides and the resulting LLR is what goes >>>>>> into >>>>>> the AB element in matrix PtP or PtL. Correct? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you! >>>>>> >>>>>> On 16 November 2017 at 17:03, Noeli

Re: Log-likelihood based correlation test?

2017-11-20 Thread Noelia Osés Fernández
>>>> On 16 November 2017 at 17:03, Noelia Osés Fernández < >>>>> no...@vicomtech.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Wonderful! Thanks Daniel! >>>>>> >>>>>> Suneel, I'm still new to the Apa

Re: Log-likelihood based correlation test?

2017-11-20 Thread Daniel Gabrieli
t; Thank you both! >>>>> >>>>> On 16 November 2017 at 16:59, Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Indeed so. Ted Dunning is an Apache Mahout PMC and committer and the >>>>>> wh

Re: Log-likelihood based correlation test?

2017-11-20 Thread Noelia Osés Fernández
od and hence u >>>>> see the LLR. >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Daniel Gabrieli <dgabrieli@ >>>>> salesforce.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I am pretty sure the LLR stuff in UR is based off of this

Re: Log-likelihood based correlation test?

2017-11-17 Thread Daniel Gabrieli
gt;>>> by Ted Dunning >>>> >>>> http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.14.5962 >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 10:26 AM Noelia Osés Fernández < >>>> no...@vicomtech.org> wrote: >>&g

Re: Log-likelihood based correlation test?

2017-11-16 Thread Noelia Osés Fernández
no...@vicomtech.org> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I've been trying to understand how the UR algorithm works and I think I >>> have a general idea. But I would like to have a *mathematical >>> description* of the step in which the LLR comes into

Re: Log-likelihood based correlation test?

2017-11-16 Thread Suneel Marthi
; have a general idea. But I would like to have a *mathematical >> description* of the step in which the LLR comes into play. In the CCO >> presentations I have found it says: >> >> (PtP) compares column to column using >> *log-likelihood based correlation test* &

Re: Log-likelihood based correlation test?

2017-11-16 Thread Daniel Gabrieli
e LLR comes into play. In the CCO presentations I > have found it says: > > (PtP) compares column to column using > *log-likelihood based correlation test* > > However, I have searched for "log-likelihood based correlation test" in > google but no joy. All I get are ex