And now it works perfectly. Thanks !
I'm curious about that option : could you provide more details ? Why does
it trigger the usage of SYNC_LDAP_USER_GROUP_NAME_ATTRIBUTE parameter to do
exactly what I was trying to achieve ? And what was the previous behaviour ?
Thanks a lot for your help,
Loïc
Oh ok. In this case can you try setting ranger.usersync.group.searchenabled
to false?
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 1:27 AM Loïc CHANEL
wrote:
> Hi Sailaja,
>
> Actually, the groups are not stored in the LDAP I'm querying (or at least
> I can't access them), so I'm retrieving the groups using
> the SY
Hi Sailaja,
Actually, the groups are not stored in the LDAP I'm querying (or at least I
can't access them), so I'm retrieving the groups using
the SYNC_LDAP_USER_GROUP_NAME_ATTRIBUTE parameter, which I configured but
doesn't seem to work as I expected.
As a matter of fact, I'm successfully retriev
Hi Loic,
I see that you have below config properties for group search. In this case
the groups are retrieved from "dc=cmb,dc=blabla,dc=org" search base. Can
you check if "CN=usr_tool_prd,OU=Tool,OU=Groupes,DC=blabla,DC=org" group is
under the configured search base?
groupSearchEnabled: true, gro
Hi team,
Am I the only one experiencing this issue ?
Thanks,
Loïc
Le lun. 19 févr. 2024 à 12:38, Loïc CHANEL a
écrit :
> Hi guys,
>
> Since 2.4, LDAP information retrieval to create groups seems broken. My
> sync issues are solved for users, but I'm still unable to pull groups from
> LDAP. For
Hi Ramesh,
Thank you for your response.
Are you talking about the Audit Tab ?
De : Ramesh Mani [mailto:rm...@apache.org]
Envoyé : mardi 21 novembre 2023 17:48
À : user@ranger.apache.org
Objet : Re: Groups
Ranger provides a feature called "User Access Report" in ranger UI where you
ca
Ranger provides a feature called "User Access Report" in ranger UI where
you can find the policies in which the user / group / role is present. Hope
this helps.
Thanks
Ramesh
On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 8:28 AM DE ROCHAMBEAU Philippe [EXT] <
philippe.de-rochambeau-prestata...@laposte.fr> wrote:
> He
