By the sounds of it jMaki is the way to go then. I understand you might be a
bit bias here, but if it does whatever DOJO does and more, capturing all
frameworks, what would be the reason for choosing any other framework?
Cheers,
Joost
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EM
Craig,
I was talking to Greg Murray about jMaki at Javapolis, and I mentioned the
possibility of generating JSF components based on some metadata much like
the RI and MyFaces do for the HTML components and the tag libraries. (I
don't think Greg fully appreciates the value of the JSF model.) Are yo
It pays to add the footnotes:
[1] https://bpcatalog.dev.java.net/
[2] https://ajax.dev.java.net/
Craig
On 1/14/07, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/14/07, JS Portal Support <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Craig,
>
> Great, it now works nicely and is portable to any other view
On 1/14/07, JS Portal Support <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Craig,
Great, it now works nicely and is portable to any other view I might
create
in the future without altering my GenericTable view.
Cool ... that's the way it's supposed to work :-).
On a different note:
Is it correct btw that M
Craig,
Great, it now works nicely and is portable to any other view I might create
in the future without altering my GenericTable view.
On a different note:
Is it correct btw that MyFaces will use DOJO AJAX toolkit as its script
engine of choice? As we are currently looking at our options it seem
On 1/13/07, JS Portal Support <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks Craig,
That makes sense. But the problem here is that generictable will be called
from many views, and not just the myfiles view. So I would love the
injection to be handled from the myfiles view, backing bean or
managed-bean
decla
